Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="reapersaurus" data-source="post: 963914" data-attributes="member: 1194">re: the AMF rangeI understand that you're not making up the references, seasong.I've just never seen a 10' radius detailed this way.In clockwork's GoD, Maturak was Large, but (probably for ease of mapping) he had the typical 0XXX0XXXXXXXMXXXXXXX0XXX0M is Maturak, X is the squares that the AMF covers, 0 is uncovered squares (the diagonals).The way you have it, Blaster actually has less squares covered, since you've centered the 10' radius on the LINE between his 2 squares.This might be technically and mathmatically correct, but I don't think 3E uses that convention when determining what squares are affected by a radius effect.You have it like:000000XXX0XXBXXXXBXX0XXX000000Where B is Blaster.I think that's what you're saying....  the pdf doc you attached has lines that intersect squares, so it's hard to tell.What squares are you saying would be in Blaster's AMF?</blockquote>