Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Kaychsea" data-source="post: 6429037" data-attributes="member: 70176">To you. But it was a known and significant phenomenon which was simply writ bigger between 3.5/4.Oddly enough I had that impression. It did seem to be the Marmite edition though.Which seems to display a lack of imagination. I can understand that people like it, I just have no idea why. Which probably displays just as bad a lack in myself, but I can live with it.You really couldn't see how to use their material in a 3.5 game? I can see why you might not want to rejig an ongoing campaign, although it's not that hard, certainly easier than doing it for 4e.  The sense of entitlement that drives most web arguments leaks into real life. Particularly when people can't defend their own position without attacking someone else's.  OK... can't see why though, unless you are now blaming Paizo for the existence of flamewars. Why do I have to be? What if I really like what they have done, or in absence of that am happy knocking out my own material for 3.5? Which is largely what I did do.Mainly because you weren't allowed not to have an opinion, or a side. Both sides were as bad as each other for that. It's what flamewars are. The very act of not agreeing with someone is seen as a grievous affront, when most of the time they just don't like what you like and don't really care if you do.</blockquote>