Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Gamehole Con Live Tweeting Perkins Panel
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 6429732" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>What constitutes a "large segment"? A majority? Or, do you have a number in mind? Do you know how many people did embrace it, to know the segment that did take it on was "not large"? </p><p></p><p>This sort of thing is actually a contributing factor in edition warring. Use of vague language that will mean different things to different people, and thoroughly unsupportable by real data. We don't have hard data. We should not speak as if we do.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Is this information for which you have a citation, or are you assuming you know the reasons?</p><p></p><p>We know that a lot of people didn't like 4e. We know that WotC chose to create a new game. But, as they say, correlation does not imply causation. While, if you were forced to bet, this would probably not be the worse bet you could make, it still remains that there could have been other reasons for the change. </p><p></p><p>I say this for a very simple reason - more important than, "How many people have embraced 4e?" is, "How much more can we do with 4e?" Combine this with the change in strategy with regards to the brand. Was 4e really a good platform upon which to base expansion into other media? 4e was a carefully crafted and balanced game - in that sense, it was perhaps the best constructed game the hobby has ever seen. But the problem with that tight construction, and the expectations that construction brings, is that it is, compared to other approaches, inflexible. That, more than how many folks had picked it up, may well have spelled its demise. </p><p></p><p>Your version of events is plausible. But so is mine. So, which one is right? You believe yours is. But do you know it, in the verifiable fact, sense? If not, why do you speak as if it is a verifiable fact, instead of a compelling interpretation of data?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And, here you have just missed a major point of going with an open license for 5e. If they have an open license, nobody has to wait for WotC to come out with more detailed modular options. Those could be built by 3rd parties!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 6429732, member: 177"] What constitutes a "large segment"? A majority? Or, do you have a number in mind? Do you know how many people did embrace it, to know the segment that did take it on was "not large"? This sort of thing is actually a contributing factor in edition warring. Use of vague language that will mean different things to different people, and thoroughly unsupportable by real data. We don't have hard data. We should not speak as if we do. Is this information for which you have a citation, or are you assuming you know the reasons? We know that a lot of people didn't like 4e. We know that WotC chose to create a new game. But, as they say, correlation does not imply causation. While, if you were forced to bet, this would probably not be the worse bet you could make, it still remains that there could have been other reasons for the change. I say this for a very simple reason - more important than, "How many people have embraced 4e?" is, "How much more can we do with 4e?" Combine this with the change in strategy with regards to the brand. Was 4e really a good platform upon which to base expansion into other media? 4e was a carefully crafted and balanced game - in that sense, it was perhaps the best constructed game the hobby has ever seen. But the problem with that tight construction, and the expectations that construction brings, is that it is, compared to other approaches, inflexible. That, more than how many folks had picked it up, may well have spelled its demise. Your version of events is plausible. But so is mine. So, which one is right? You believe yours is. But do you know it, in the verifiable fact, sense? If not, why do you speak as if it is a verifiable fact, instead of a compelling interpretation of data? And, here you have just missed a major point of going with an open license for 5e. If they have an open license, nobody has to wait for WotC to come out with more detailed modular options. Those could be built by 3rd parties! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Gamehole Con Live Tweeting Perkins Panel
Top