Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="JeffB" data-source="post: 4459541" data-attributes="member: 518">I Love this game. I really do. However it's def not for majority of player types I've run into over the years. I tried to get a game off the ground with a&nbsp; couple of people and they just couldn't grasp the narrative/creative aspect nor &quot;bidding&quot;.&nbsp; I think some types of players just need everyting codified and available in a rulebook for them to pick and&nbsp; choose from. Others get inspired and love to make things up as they go along . Nothing wrong with loving or hating it. Different strokes and all <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Avalon Hill had some great physically done RPG products in the early-mid 80s: P&amp;P, RQ3, LOC, but I think the only really good game system they managed to put out was James Bond (Victory Games was a sub of AH).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="JeffB, post: 4459541, member: 518"] I Love this game. I really do. However it's def not for majority of player types I've run into over the years. I tried to get a game off the ground with a couple of people and they just couldn't grasp the narrative/creative aspect nor "bidding". I think some types of players just need everyting codified and available in a rulebook for them to pick and choose from. Others get inspired and love to make things up as they go along . Nothing wrong with loving or hating it. Different strokes and all :) Avalon Hill had some great physically done RPG products in the early-mid 80s: P&P, RQ3, LOC, but I think the only really good game system they managed to put out was James Bond (Victory Games was a sub of AH). [/QUOTE]

Verification