Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
Gaming W/Jemal: Planar Quest! (Closed)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jemal" data-source="post: 6091184" data-attributes="member: 9026"><p>It depends on how you look at it. Trip is something anybody can attempt. If you're looking at it from the viewpoint of someone who hasn't invested any resources into it, tripping is much more effective than ANY spell, because there's no such thing as a spell anybody can cast without previously investing something in it. Someone who invests half as much into tripping as one would into casting those types of 'control' spells can be extremely effective, without having to worry about how many 'times per day' they can do it.</p><p>Lets look at the most minimal of investment For Tripping, it's one feat: Improved trip, and good bab/str. For a spell, that would be the equivalent of one spell chosen(lets say Hold Monster) and good caster level/stat. Looking at your specific stats, someone who invested the same casting stat as you use for your tripping stat, the DC to resist their charm would be 10+5(spell level) +7(stat) = 22 Will DC. You require a touch attack, he requires a spell resistance check (given average rarities and numbers of spell resistance vs touch AC's, I'd put those at about the same difficulty). You can be tripped if you fail, they have limited spells per day.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I presume you're trying to convince me to change my ruling by offering this as an alternative, but I'm afraid I still have to stick to the original rule. </p><p>The advantage is not hard-won, it only seems like that because you're trying to trip a character with a high touch ac and a high trip check himself. Outside of truly epic and gargantuan monsters, Wade's about the hardest thing to trip you'll come across in this campaign (and I'd imagine most others)... And you got him on what the second try?</p><p>Against most average challenges, Ur will be a wrecking machine capable of knocking 90+% of his opponents flat with little effort. Ur's chance of tripping not only usually significantly better than his chance of hitting, it afterwards IMPROVES said chance (As well as that of all your allies). </p><p></p><p>Lets compare to Tutek, for example. I think he's a good example of a "Powerful Fighter"</p><p>If UR were to just full round Tutek: 26/26/26/21/15 VS AC 32. </p><p>Chances of hitting: 75, 75, 75, 50, 25. That's statistically 3 hits.</p><p></p><p>If he were to try Trip vs Tutek: 26/26/26/21/15 vs touch ac 13. +21 on the opposed str check vs Tutek's +13.</p><p>you need a 1 to not hit, and he has to roll 8 higher than you to beat you. That's a VERY good chance that you'll win. If you roll above 12 you've already won.. that's a MINIMUM 45% chance of beating him before he even gets a roll.</p><p>With the +4 for attacking prone, your chances of hitting for damage are then 95/95/95/70/45. So if you DO trip on the first attack, you get a statistical 4 hits. If you DONT trip on the first, but get him the second time, you get statistically 3.05 hits.</p><p>So even if you get extremely unlucky on the trip check and he manages to stay standing for the first hit, your average damage is still the same(Insignificantly better, actually), AND your opponent is prone, causing him to either expend an action to stand(Granting you yet another free hit), use some sort of resource, attempt a skill check, or take the continued penalties for remaining prone.</p><p></p><p>Now you may say "But Tutek's a Brute-fighter, not the average monster type we'll be facing". Well, first off I'd say to you that I prefer using characters to monsters, and second Off I say OK, lets pick a fairly standard CR 20 monster: The Balor. he's bigger, harder to hit, and stronger than Tutek. Better vs Trip in EVERY way.</p><p>Balor has AC 35, Touch 16, and opposes your trip with a +16. SO..</p><p>If UR were to just full round IT: 26/26/26/21/15 VS AC 35. </p><p>Chances of hitting: 60, 60, 60, 35, 10. That's statistically 2.25 hits.</p><p></p><p>If he were to try Trip vs Balor: 26/26/26/21/15 vs touch ac 16. +21 on the opposed str check vs Balor's +16.</p><p>you still need a 1 to miss, and it has to roll 5 higher than you to beat you. Still damn good odds for you. You need a 16 to guarantee sucess(25% chance that he doesn't even get a roll).</p><p>With the +4 for attacking prone, your chances of hitting for damage are then 80/80/80/55/30. So if you DO trip on the first attack, you get a statistical 3.25 hits. If you DONT trip on the first, but get him the second time, you get statistically 2.45 hits.</p><p>Again, even if you get unlucky and he beats you on the first trip, odds of him beating you the second time are exceptionally slim, and you STILL increase your hit Rate, PLUS the above 'negatives of being prone'.</p><p></p><p>Does it still seem so useless?</p><p></p><p></p><p>*EDIT: Just for giggles, lets do the above Hold Monster caster vs tutek and Balor. </p><p>Remember this Caster has as much invested in Hold Monster as UR does in Trip.</p><p></p><p>Tutek 0 SR, Will save +14 vs DC 22 = 35% chance of being held.</p><p>Chance of failing intial save AND not breaking out on his round: 12%</p><p></p><p>BALOR: SR 28 vs CL20, Will save +19 vs DC 22 = 65% chance of beating SR, 10% chance of failign save = 6.5%</p><p>Chance of failing initial save AND not breaking out on its round: 0.65%</p><p>/edit*</p><p></p><p></p><p>Ur can out-trip most average brute/fighter types of his level, in my mind if you're significantly better at something than the average, that means that you're good at it, hence UR is good at tripping. I never said he was the best. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":P" title="Stick out tongue :P" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":P" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jemal, post: 6091184, member: 9026"] It depends on how you look at it. Trip is something anybody can attempt. If you're looking at it from the viewpoint of someone who hasn't invested any resources into it, tripping is much more effective than ANY spell, because there's no such thing as a spell anybody can cast without previously investing something in it. Someone who invests half as much into tripping as one would into casting those types of 'control' spells can be extremely effective, without having to worry about how many 'times per day' they can do it. Lets look at the most minimal of investment For Tripping, it's one feat: Improved trip, and good bab/str. For a spell, that would be the equivalent of one spell chosen(lets say Hold Monster) and good caster level/stat. Looking at your specific stats, someone who invested the same casting stat as you use for your tripping stat, the DC to resist their charm would be 10+5(spell level) +7(stat) = 22 Will DC. You require a touch attack, he requires a spell resistance check (given average rarities and numbers of spell resistance vs touch AC's, I'd put those at about the same difficulty). You can be tripped if you fail, they have limited spells per day. I presume you're trying to convince me to change my ruling by offering this as an alternative, but I'm afraid I still have to stick to the original rule. The advantage is not hard-won, it only seems like that because you're trying to trip a character with a high touch ac and a high trip check himself. Outside of truly epic and gargantuan monsters, Wade's about the hardest thing to trip you'll come across in this campaign (and I'd imagine most others)... And you got him on what the second try? Against most average challenges, Ur will be a wrecking machine capable of knocking 90+% of his opponents flat with little effort. Ur's chance of tripping not only usually significantly better than his chance of hitting, it afterwards IMPROVES said chance (As well as that of all your allies). Lets compare to Tutek, for example. I think he's a good example of a "Powerful Fighter" If UR were to just full round Tutek: 26/26/26/21/15 VS AC 32. Chances of hitting: 75, 75, 75, 50, 25. That's statistically 3 hits. If he were to try Trip vs Tutek: 26/26/26/21/15 vs touch ac 13. +21 on the opposed str check vs Tutek's +13. you need a 1 to not hit, and he has to roll 8 higher than you to beat you. That's a VERY good chance that you'll win. If you roll above 12 you've already won.. that's a MINIMUM 45% chance of beating him before he even gets a roll. With the +4 for attacking prone, your chances of hitting for damage are then 95/95/95/70/45. So if you DO trip on the first attack, you get a statistical 4 hits. If you DONT trip on the first, but get him the second time, you get statistically 3.05 hits. So even if you get extremely unlucky on the trip check and he manages to stay standing for the first hit, your average damage is still the same(Insignificantly better, actually), AND your opponent is prone, causing him to either expend an action to stand(Granting you yet another free hit), use some sort of resource, attempt a skill check, or take the continued penalties for remaining prone. Now you may say "But Tutek's a Brute-fighter, not the average monster type we'll be facing". Well, first off I'd say to you that I prefer using characters to monsters, and second Off I say OK, lets pick a fairly standard CR 20 monster: The Balor. he's bigger, harder to hit, and stronger than Tutek. Better vs Trip in EVERY way. Balor has AC 35, Touch 16, and opposes your trip with a +16. SO.. If UR were to just full round IT: 26/26/26/21/15 VS AC 35. Chances of hitting: 60, 60, 60, 35, 10. That's statistically 2.25 hits. If he were to try Trip vs Balor: 26/26/26/21/15 vs touch ac 16. +21 on the opposed str check vs Balor's +16. you still need a 1 to miss, and it has to roll 5 higher than you to beat you. Still damn good odds for you. You need a 16 to guarantee sucess(25% chance that he doesn't even get a roll). With the +4 for attacking prone, your chances of hitting for damage are then 80/80/80/55/30. So if you DO trip on the first attack, you get a statistical 3.25 hits. If you DONT trip on the first, but get him the second time, you get statistically 2.45 hits. Again, even if you get unlucky and he beats you on the first trip, odds of him beating you the second time are exceptionally slim, and you STILL increase your hit Rate, PLUS the above 'negatives of being prone'. Does it still seem so useless? *EDIT: Just for giggles, lets do the above Hold Monster caster vs tutek and Balor. Remember this Caster has as much invested in Hold Monster as UR does in Trip. Tutek 0 SR, Will save +14 vs DC 22 = 35% chance of being held. Chance of failing intial save AND not breaking out on his round: 12% BALOR: SR 28 vs CL20, Will save +19 vs DC 22 = 65% chance of beating SR, 10% chance of failign save = 6.5% Chance of failing initial save AND not breaking out on its round: 0.65% /edit* Ur can out-trip most average brute/fighter types of his level, in my mind if you're significantly better at something than the average, that means that you're good at it, hence UR is good at tripping. I never said he was the best. :P [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
Gaming W/Jemal: Planar Quest! (Closed)
Top