Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Gamma World - Thoughts? Review?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sea Devil" data-source="post: 2141345" data-attributes="member: 22810"><p>I too was very disappointed in GWd20. Ultimately I give a 4 out of 10.</p><p></p><p> I've kept my copy of it and have read and reread it several times. The problem with it ultimately comes down to this: it was a <strong>personal project </strong> and not a <strong>market product</strong>. The editor/creators focused on what they wanted/liked and blewoff/ignored what they didn't care for. </p><p></p><p> For example it bends over backwards to put technological sci-fi in every chance it gets and tries to make everything about it "cooler" than anythign else. I've heard and read a lot of comments that the sythetics are more of a EL +1 race than balanced. Plus (to my understanding) there's little to no side-effect to having cybernetics and/or nanotech (which IMHO was overpowered, the nano tech that is). However; biotech, mutations and psychic powers all screwed up the characters <strong>even</strong> if they supposed to be beneficial.</p><p></p><p> I remember one of the creators posting that the pregame testing went beautifully. I bet they handpicked friends of their's to test it and they had the same interests.</p><p></p><p> I also saw a post once by one of the creators complaining about the negative reviews that GWd20 was getting and boy did he come off (IMHO) as whiny. Of course he posted this on a forum that kept praising it and just let the sympathy posts flow. </p><p></p><p> Now I do respect that they did put a lot of time into their personal version of GW, but when you revise an existing setting and make only barely like the previous versions you better be ready for some serious criticisms. </p><p></p><p> Oh well maybe the next version will at least be half-way decent.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sea Devil, post: 2141345, member: 22810"] I too was very disappointed in GWd20. Ultimately I give a 4 out of 10. I've kept my copy of it and have read and reread it several times. The problem with it ultimately comes down to this: it was a [B]personal project [/B] and not a [B]market product[/B]. The editor/creators focused on what they wanted/liked and blewoff/ignored what they didn't care for. For example it bends over backwards to put technological sci-fi in every chance it gets and tries to make everything about it "cooler" than anythign else. I've heard and read a lot of comments that the sythetics are more of a EL +1 race than balanced. Plus (to my understanding) there's little to no side-effect to having cybernetics and/or nanotech (which IMHO was overpowered, the nano tech that is). However; biotech, mutations and psychic powers all screwed up the characters [B]even[/B] if they supposed to be beneficial. I remember one of the creators posting that the pregame testing went beautifully. I bet they handpicked friends of their's to test it and they had the same interests. I also saw a post once by one of the creators complaining about the negative reviews that GWd20 was getting and boy did he come off (IMHO) as whiny. Of course he posted this on a forum that kept praising it and just let the sympathy posts flow. Now I do respect that they did put a lot of time into their personal version of GW, but when you revise an existing setting and make only barely like the previous versions you better be ready for some serious criticisms. Oh well maybe the next version will at least be half-way decent. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Gamma World - Thoughts? Review?
Top