Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Gatekeeping Part II: The OG (Original Gatekeeping)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GreyLord" data-source="post: 7897777" data-attributes="member: 4348"><p>I was one of those wargamers. IN MY OPINION...part of what you say is inaccurate. You didn't need miniatures or special dice to play a wargame, in fact, my contingent of wargamers didn't use miniatures at ALL most of the time.</p><p></p><p>I played wargames via the chits and board. This was something that became bigger with Gettysburg and other wargames that came with chits and hexes and other various ways and instruments.</p><p></p><p>You are right, there was pushback, but I don't see it quite as you portray it. It was more of a snobbish type of outlook to my mind, where the wargamer deals with REAL historical items vs. the fantasy imaginations of other things. They are interested in the recreation of history, or the enactment of history requiring historical accuracy to see how things could turn out differently or why they turned out the way they did. They play it to engulf themselves in the history itself and to be a part of it while playing the game.</p><p></p><p>On the otherhand, fantasy was more the realm of those who didn't like or enjoy history as much and wanted to create stories. One was for the historians and businessmen, the other for the English and literature majors.</p><p></p><p>However, it was not so much gatekeeping in the way you portray it as seeing RPG gamers not in the same place as wargamers. It was not saying that D&D players had to play wargames or could not play wargames so much as seeing those playing D&D as lesser than wargamers (at least in some ways). A sort of disdain for the new type of "wargame" that was being published...that it had no place among "TRUE" wargames or wargamers.</p><p></p><p>Of course, with the decrease (at least to my perception) and gradual decline of chit and board wargames over the past few decades (and I'd say, ever since RPGs took their steam, and the rest of the audience who did miniature wargaming overall were replaced with another type of wargaming such as that WITH FANTASY and SCI-FI such as warhammer) that sentiment has disappeared to be non-existent in rather short order (not really even being a factor as soon as a few months (if even years) after OD&D's release even).</p><p></p><p>TLDR - IMO Not so much of the same type of gatekeeping as you are saying, as much as looking at RPGs as lesser things for the same audience than Wargames, and that RPGs were a different sort of beast. Something comparatively short lived as RPGs and new Wargames of Fantasy and sci fi slew that beast rather quickly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GreyLord, post: 7897777, member: 4348"] I was one of those wargamers. IN MY OPINION...part of what you say is inaccurate. You didn't need miniatures or special dice to play a wargame, in fact, my contingent of wargamers didn't use miniatures at ALL most of the time. I played wargames via the chits and board. This was something that became bigger with Gettysburg and other wargames that came with chits and hexes and other various ways and instruments. You are right, there was pushback, but I don't see it quite as you portray it. It was more of a snobbish type of outlook to my mind, where the wargamer deals with REAL historical items vs. the fantasy imaginations of other things. They are interested in the recreation of history, or the enactment of history requiring historical accuracy to see how things could turn out differently or why they turned out the way they did. They play it to engulf themselves in the history itself and to be a part of it while playing the game. On the otherhand, fantasy was more the realm of those who didn't like or enjoy history as much and wanted to create stories. One was for the historians and businessmen, the other for the English and literature majors. However, it was not so much gatekeeping in the way you portray it as seeing RPG gamers not in the same place as wargamers. It was not saying that D&D players had to play wargames or could not play wargames so much as seeing those playing D&D as lesser than wargamers (at least in some ways). A sort of disdain for the new type of "wargame" that was being published...that it had no place among "TRUE" wargames or wargamers. Of course, with the decrease (at least to my perception) and gradual decline of chit and board wargames over the past few decades (and I'd say, ever since RPGs took their steam, and the rest of the audience who did miniature wargaming overall were replaced with another type of wargaming such as that WITH FANTASY and SCI-FI such as warhammer) that sentiment has disappeared to be non-existent in rather short order (not really even being a factor as soon as a few months (if even years) after OD&D's release even). TLDR - IMO Not so much of the same type of gatekeeping as you are saying, as much as looking at RPGs as lesser things for the same audience than Wargames, and that RPGs were a different sort of beast. Something comparatively short lived as RPGs and new Wargames of Fantasy and sci fi slew that beast rather quickly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Gatekeeping Part II: The OG (Original Gatekeeping)
Top