Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Gave up 4E would essentialls win us back?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 5347132" data-attributes="member: 996"><p>Essentials addresses the former concern. Classes that were formerly balanced at a fundamental mechanical level are now mechanically distinct - the melee types are back on the reservation, though it remains to be seen of the primacy of casters at higher levels has been restored, they do get a couple of their old tricks back at low level. It's particularly clear with the Fighter. Where the 4e Fighter was almost caster-like in having to husband daily and varied encounter spells ('exploits'), the two Essentials builds play more like traditional Fighters - you hit things, maybe you occassionally hit them particularly hard or put a little english on 'em. Specifically the 'Slayer' build plays a lot like an AD&D fighter, while the 'Knight' build plays a bit like a 3e fighter. In both cases, it's more a similarity of 'feel' than of mechanics, but if you missed having fighters like that around, it could be a nice change. </p><p></p><p></p><p>The latter concern, not so much. Encounters in Essentials are balanced essentially (npi) like they were in 4e, PC victory is pretty nearly a foregone conclusion. Prior to Essentials, the MM3 introduced monsters that did more damage on average, which might make combats a bit quicker and more exciting, but probably won't much change the feel that bothered you.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Since you're already familiar with the game, there's no need to start with the Red Box, the underlying resolution systems are little changed. I'd suggest you pick up Heroes of the Fallen Land (ony 20 bucks) and see how the classes look to you - classes are probably the most significant change. If it looks good, you might pick up the MM3 or wait for the Essentials monster book ('Vault?') and try a few combats to see if the changes to classes and monsters add up to something you like.</p><p></p><p>Hope you like it, WotC has alienated a few loyal 4e fans in the hopes of getting you back, it'd be a shame if you didn't at least give it a try. If you don't want to invest in a book, you could just drop in to a D&D Encounters event. An hour or two on a Wed night. Just be sure to get a table where they're /just/ using Essentials builds (officially it's Essentials only but some DMs make exceptions).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 5347132, member: 996"] Essentials addresses the former concern. Classes that were formerly balanced at a fundamental mechanical level are now mechanically distinct - the melee types are back on the reservation, though it remains to be seen of the primacy of casters at higher levels has been restored, they do get a couple of their old tricks back at low level. It's particularly clear with the Fighter. Where the 4e Fighter was almost caster-like in having to husband daily and varied encounter spells ('exploits'), the two Essentials builds play more like traditional Fighters - you hit things, maybe you occassionally hit them particularly hard or put a little english on 'em. Specifically the 'Slayer' build plays a lot like an AD&D fighter, while the 'Knight' build plays a bit like a 3e fighter. In both cases, it's more a similarity of 'feel' than of mechanics, but if you missed having fighters like that around, it could be a nice change. The latter concern, not so much. Encounters in Essentials are balanced essentially (npi) like they were in 4e, PC victory is pretty nearly a foregone conclusion. Prior to Essentials, the MM3 introduced monsters that did more damage on average, which might make combats a bit quicker and more exciting, but probably won't much change the feel that bothered you. Since you're already familiar with the game, there's no need to start with the Red Box, the underlying resolution systems are little changed. I'd suggest you pick up Heroes of the Fallen Land (ony 20 bucks) and see how the classes look to you - classes are probably the most significant change. If it looks good, you might pick up the MM3 or wait for the Essentials monster book ('Vault?') and try a few combats to see if the changes to classes and monsters add up to something you like. Hope you like it, WotC has alienated a few loyal 4e fans in the hopes of getting you back, it'd be a shame if you didn't at least give it a try. If you don't want to invest in a book, you could just drop in to a D&D Encounters event. An hour or two on a Wed night. Just be sure to get a table where they're /just/ using Essentials builds (officially it's Essentials only but some DMs make exceptions). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Gave up 4E would essentialls win us back?
Top