Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Guilt Puppy" data-source="post: 623651" data-attributes="member: 6521">Argent/Timothy: Thanks <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> I still worry that the magic system may be a little boring at lower levels... But at least the lower-level abilities tend to have the broadest range of application, so creative players should be okay.The other new classes look great... I'd suggesting leaving in the PHB Barbarian as an option, but I really like the flavor of the new version.Beast-rider is also great... I might swap Treat as Equal around to allow the rider to take the form of the mount (or maybe both!), although I don't know how specifically either is referenced in the books (in either case, it's an ability that will rarely occur, so...)I think I might go for an Archer/Wolf-Rider once we start going... In past experience, you always end up with a disproportionate number of spell-casters in EQ RPGs (compared to the books), so I try to avoid them... That, and if the magic system turns out to be over-powered, I don't want to get accused of making it that way on purpose <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Guilt Puppy, post: 623651, member: 6521"] Argent/Timothy: Thanks :) I still worry that the magic system may be a little boring at lower levels... But at least the lower-level abilities tend to have the broadest range of application, so creative players should be okay. The other new classes look great... I'd suggesting leaving in the PHB Barbarian as an option, but I really like the flavor of the new version. Beast-rider is also great... I might swap Treat as Equal around to allow the [i]rider[/i] to take the form of the mount (or maybe both!), although I don't know how specifically either is referenced in the books (in either case, it's an ability that will rarely occur, so...) I think I might go for an Archer/Wolf-Rider once we start going... In past experience, you always end up with a disproportionate number of spell-casters in EQ RPGs (compared to the books), so I try to avoid them... That, and if the magic system turns out to be over-powered, I don't want to get accused of making it that way on purpose :) [/QUOTE]

Verification