Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Gelatinous cube tpk
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 3371069" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>Mistakes were probably made on both sides.</p><p></p><p>"Long story short..." </p><p></p><p>Engulf is not automatic. You do get a saving throw. So lets here that long story.</p><p></p><p>"Squeezing down a 5x5 corridor..."</p><p></p><p>Normally, squeezing requires a penalty. Oozes are amorpheous plastic beings, and as such (thought its not explicit and it should be) they effectively have high epic levels of the escape artist skill. In other words, oozes get no penalty for squeezing.</p><p></p><p>"Not having leverage..."</p><p></p><p>You always have leverage in a grapple. At the very least, you can lever yourself against whatever force is holding you. If no force is holding you, you aren't grappled. If a gelatinious cube's interior was completely non-viscous, then you wouldn't have leverage, but you also wouldn't be grappled and could escape with a Swim skill check. </p><p></p><p>"2) I ruled that all the characters had an effective dex of 1 for reflex saves, since they were trapped inside the thing."</p><p></p><p>No. The rules are pretty clear here, and you should read them. The characters loose thier DEX bonus (if they have one) when grappled for the purposes of AC only. There are no other penalties. </p><p></p><p>Now, if they are paralyzed, that is a different story. Paralyzed characters are helpless, and thus automatically have a DEX of 0.</p><p></p><p>Paralyzed characters do not automatically fail reflex saves. They aren't even automatically hit by attacks (although with a Dex of 0 and a +4 bonus to hit them, its a fair bet they will be hit).</p><p></p><p>"Strength and Gelatinious cubes"</p><p></p><p>You just learned one of your major lessons as a DM. Minor changes in the abilities of a monster can have enormous impacts on the lethality of the monster, if what you change is one of the critical weaknesses of the monster. In the case of grapplers, increasing thier size and strength, especially if their size or strength is initially relatively low, will enormously increase the challenge. Your estimate of CR 5 is probably about correct, assuming you didn't do any other enhancements to the creature, but what you discovered is that one of the assumptions on gelatinous cube CR is that the players can recognize the creature and will take appropriate actions (like running away). Since you were dealing with inexperienced players, and since the Gelatinous cube is a TPK machine if not properly dealt with, I'm not surprised at the results.</p><p></p><p>If you really want to make the Gelantious Cube killer, fix its other two weaknesses - make it fly and increase its speed. </p><p></p><p>"Fireball exploding on impact"</p><p></p><p>Yes. Although the spellcraft check to know that should have been relatively low since its a property common to spells in general (and not just fireball), DC 8 would have been appropriate, and certainly not higher than DC 13. If a 4th level character had invested in spellcraft much at all, I don't see how they would have failed a spellcraft check of a DC like that. Using a typical 4th level Wizard I get a spellcraft skill check of +12 (+3 Int, +7 spellcraft ranks, +2 synergy from 5 ranks of Know (Arcana)), and that's not even counting a possible circumstance bonus if the Wizard had used the wand before.</p><p></p><p>"Cube blocks line of effect"</p><p></p><p>Yes it does. Only the wand user and the cube should have been effected by the full blast of the wand. The other players trapped in the cube effectively had full cover, though I would have ruled that if the blast dropped the cube to less than -10 hit points, that the blast burned through the cover (I don't want players arguing that a sheet of paper or a gauze curtain blocks line of effect on a fireball, even though under the RAW it does), and the players were exposed to the excess damage (probably only a couple of points) and that even then I think I would have given the party the equivalent of evasion, so that if they made thier reflex saves (paralyzed ones having 0 DEX) they would have avoided all damage.</p><p></p><p>"Characters knowing about Gelatinous cubes even if thier players do not"</p><p></p><p>I think its reasonable that the characters might know something about Gelatinous cubes, but rather unreasonable to assume that they automatically should know about them. My personal feeling is that oozes are 'natural' (non-magical) beings in a fantasy world, and thus fall under the province of Knowledge (Nature). If you think oozes are magical, then they should fall under Knowledge (Arcana). Unless thier background prevents it, I personally allow characters to make intelligence checks on any knowledge that they aren't trained in to reflect the fact that people will collect bits of information about fields even if they aren't skilled in them. A gelatinous cube is a fairly rare creature, not ordinarily a part of an average person's experience, so I'd give like a DC 20 Knowledge (Nature)/Intelligence check to recognize one (as a type of dangerous ooze) when it had been spotted, and a DC 25 Knowledge (Nature)/Intelligence check to know significant things about it (it paralyzes by touch, it engulfs foes by running over them, its slow moving, its harmed by ordinary weapons).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 3371069, member: 4937"] Mistakes were probably made on both sides. "Long story short..." Engulf is not automatic. You do get a saving throw. So lets here that long story. "Squeezing down a 5x5 corridor..." Normally, squeezing requires a penalty. Oozes are amorpheous plastic beings, and as such (thought its not explicit and it should be) they effectively have high epic levels of the escape artist skill. In other words, oozes get no penalty for squeezing. "Not having leverage..." You always have leverage in a grapple. At the very least, you can lever yourself against whatever force is holding you. If no force is holding you, you aren't grappled. If a gelatinious cube's interior was completely non-viscous, then you wouldn't have leverage, but you also wouldn't be grappled and could escape with a Swim skill check. "2) I ruled that all the characters had an effective dex of 1 for reflex saves, since they were trapped inside the thing." No. The rules are pretty clear here, and you should read them. The characters loose thier DEX bonus (if they have one) when grappled for the purposes of AC only. There are no other penalties. Now, if they are paralyzed, that is a different story. Paralyzed characters are helpless, and thus automatically have a DEX of 0. Paralyzed characters do not automatically fail reflex saves. They aren't even automatically hit by attacks (although with a Dex of 0 and a +4 bonus to hit them, its a fair bet they will be hit). "Strength and Gelatinious cubes" You just learned one of your major lessons as a DM. Minor changes in the abilities of a monster can have enormous impacts on the lethality of the monster, if what you change is one of the critical weaknesses of the monster. In the case of grapplers, increasing thier size and strength, especially if their size or strength is initially relatively low, will enormously increase the challenge. Your estimate of CR 5 is probably about correct, assuming you didn't do any other enhancements to the creature, but what you discovered is that one of the assumptions on gelatinous cube CR is that the players can recognize the creature and will take appropriate actions (like running away). Since you were dealing with inexperienced players, and since the Gelatinous cube is a TPK machine if not properly dealt with, I'm not surprised at the results. If you really want to make the Gelantious Cube killer, fix its other two weaknesses - make it fly and increase its speed. "Fireball exploding on impact" Yes. Although the spellcraft check to know that should have been relatively low since its a property common to spells in general (and not just fireball), DC 8 would have been appropriate, and certainly not higher than DC 13. If a 4th level character had invested in spellcraft much at all, I don't see how they would have failed a spellcraft check of a DC like that. Using a typical 4th level Wizard I get a spellcraft skill check of +12 (+3 Int, +7 spellcraft ranks, +2 synergy from 5 ranks of Know (Arcana)), and that's not even counting a possible circumstance bonus if the Wizard had used the wand before. "Cube blocks line of effect" Yes it does. Only the wand user and the cube should have been effected by the full blast of the wand. The other players trapped in the cube effectively had full cover, though I would have ruled that if the blast dropped the cube to less than -10 hit points, that the blast burned through the cover (I don't want players arguing that a sheet of paper or a gauze curtain blocks line of effect on a fireball, even though under the RAW it does), and the players were exposed to the excess damage (probably only a couple of points) and that even then I think I would have given the party the equivalent of evasion, so that if they made thier reflex saves (paralyzed ones having 0 DEX) they would have avoided all damage. "Characters knowing about Gelatinous cubes even if thier players do not" I think its reasonable that the characters might know something about Gelatinous cubes, but rather unreasonable to assume that they automatically should know about them. My personal feeling is that oozes are 'natural' (non-magical) beings in a fantasy world, and thus fall under the province of Knowledge (Nature). If you think oozes are magical, then they should fall under Knowledge (Arcana). Unless thier background prevents it, I personally allow characters to make intelligence checks on any knowledge that they aren't trained in to reflect the fact that people will collect bits of information about fields even if they aren't skilled in them. A gelatinous cube is a fairly rare creature, not ordinarily a part of an average person's experience, so I'd give like a DC 20 Knowledge (Nature)/Intelligence check to recognize one (as a type of dangerous ooze) when it had been spotted, and a DC 25 Knowledge (Nature)/Intelligence check to know significant things about it (it paralyzes by touch, it engulfs foes by running over them, its slow moving, its harmed by ordinary weapons). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Gelatinous cube tpk
Top