Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Gelatinous cube tpk
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lottrbacchus" data-source="post: 3379027" data-attributes="member: 48191"><p><strong>slightly longer version of the story</strong></p><p></p><p>First: How does a 10' cube fit in a 5' wide corridor? </p><p>It is an ooze and:</p><p>"An ooze is an amorphous or mutable creature"</p><p>so I said it was twice as long and half as wide.</p><p></p><p>Second:</p><p>"Although it moves slowly, a gelatinous cube can simply mow down Large or smaller creatures as a standard action. It cannot make a slam attack during a round in which it engulfs. The gelatinous cube merely has to move over the opponents, affecting as many as it can cover."</p><p></p><p>I read that as the GC having its own version of overrun- it can move 15' and 'affecting as many as it can cover'.</p><p></p><p></p><p>At any rate: The lead character first notices that there seems to be some stone and metal items floating in the tunnel and then notices that the air ahead actually seems solid somehow. He ducks and holds his action. The second character in line shoots two arrows which I say stick in the solid whatever it is.</p><p></p><p>I ask if the first character wants to take his action and he still waits. The cube moves up and I ask if he wants AoO or a ST. He chooses ST and fails, gets engulfed, and fails his save against paralyze. </p><p></p><p>I don't recall what the 3rd character does, but the 4th starts splashing oil all over the place.</p><p></p><p>Next round, the new front character, after seeing his comrade engulfed, moves 5' back and shoots two arrows. Now, even if i was wrong in the engulf multiple opponents in the same round, the cube still can move 15' (its movement rate) and engulf whatever is in the final 5' that it moved over. Also, character 2 saw the thing move 10' and engulf character 1. That he chose to move 5' back and shoot two arrows, thus only being 5' away from the creature, this is me being a bad DM?</p><p></p><p>So, character 2 fails both saving throws and is engulfed. Meanwhile character 3 is basically doing nothing and character 4 is still throwing oil all over the place. </p><p></p><p>Next round: So, whether or not the rules were interpreted correctly, the next two characters have seen the cube move a total of 30' forward, engulfing their friends. Character 3 attacks the cube and character 4 continues with his oil obsession. The cube moves 15' and both characters fail their engulf STs. One isn't paralyzed.</p><p></p><p>Next many rounds: Though it seems logical to make the only non-paralyzed character save every round he is engulfed, I don't. He fishes out a dagger and goes to town damaging the cube from inside. As the other 2 characters (3 and 4) become unparalyzed, they join in. I let them know that it seems to be effective.</p><p></p><p>When the second character finally becomes unparalyzed, he decides to use his wand of fireballs. He is a sorcerer/ranger and doesn't know fireball. He'd either never used it before or used it just once. I told him that fireballs explode when they hit something. He said he was going to do it anyway. What should I do, not allow him his action? So I tell him to make a spellcraft check- that represents what you know of magic, right? He utterly fails the check and launches the fireball.</p><p></p><p>Regarding the fireball and the effects on other characters- I probably should have divided the cube's hit points, perhaps adding its con in or some other way accounted for its mass, evenly among all the squares it occupied and subtracted that from the fireball's burn through as it reached the other characters. But I didn't. That didn't occur to me until I got home. And the players didn't argue for that either. </p><p></p><p>Regardless- Was I wrong with their saving throws? Yes. Would it have mattered? Not so much. The character with the most remaining hit points still would have failed, and the rest all were under 17 HPs at that time.</p><p></p><p>Had they continued with their dagger work, the thing would have been dead in 2 rounds, since they could only miss on a natural 1.</p><p></p><p>So there you go.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lottrbacchus, post: 3379027, member: 48191"] [b]slightly longer version of the story[/b] First: How does a 10' cube fit in a 5' wide corridor? It is an ooze and: "An ooze is an amorphous or mutable creature" so I said it was twice as long and half as wide. Second: "Although it moves slowly, a gelatinous cube can simply mow down Large or smaller creatures as a standard action. It cannot make a slam attack during a round in which it engulfs. The gelatinous cube merely has to move over the opponents, affecting as many as it can cover." I read that as the GC having its own version of overrun- it can move 15' and 'affecting as many as it can cover'. At any rate: The lead character first notices that there seems to be some stone and metal items floating in the tunnel and then notices that the air ahead actually seems solid somehow. He ducks and holds his action. The second character in line shoots two arrows which I say stick in the solid whatever it is. I ask if the first character wants to take his action and he still waits. The cube moves up and I ask if he wants AoO or a ST. He chooses ST and fails, gets engulfed, and fails his save against paralyze. I don't recall what the 3rd character does, but the 4th starts splashing oil all over the place. Next round, the new front character, after seeing his comrade engulfed, moves 5' back and shoots two arrows. Now, even if i was wrong in the engulf multiple opponents in the same round, the cube still can move 15' (its movement rate) and engulf whatever is in the final 5' that it moved over. Also, character 2 saw the thing move 10' and engulf character 1. That he chose to move 5' back and shoot two arrows, thus only being 5' away from the creature, this is me being a bad DM? So, character 2 fails both saving throws and is engulfed. Meanwhile character 3 is basically doing nothing and character 4 is still throwing oil all over the place. Next round: So, whether or not the rules were interpreted correctly, the next two characters have seen the cube move a total of 30' forward, engulfing their friends. Character 3 attacks the cube and character 4 continues with his oil obsession. The cube moves 15' and both characters fail their engulf STs. One isn't paralyzed. Next many rounds: Though it seems logical to make the only non-paralyzed character save every round he is engulfed, I don't. He fishes out a dagger and goes to town damaging the cube from inside. As the other 2 characters (3 and 4) become unparalyzed, they join in. I let them know that it seems to be effective. When the second character finally becomes unparalyzed, he decides to use his wand of fireballs. He is a sorcerer/ranger and doesn't know fireball. He'd either never used it before or used it just once. I told him that fireballs explode when they hit something. He said he was going to do it anyway. What should I do, not allow him his action? So I tell him to make a spellcraft check- that represents what you know of magic, right? He utterly fails the check and launches the fireball. Regarding the fireball and the effects on other characters- I probably should have divided the cube's hit points, perhaps adding its con in or some other way accounted for its mass, evenly among all the squares it occupied and subtracted that from the fireball's burn through as it reached the other characters. But I didn't. That didn't occur to me until I got home. And the players didn't argue for that either. Regardless- Was I wrong with their saving throws? Yes. Would it have mattered? Not so much. The character with the most remaining hit points still would have failed, and the rest all were under 17 HPs at that time. Had they continued with their dagger work, the thing would have been dead in 2 rounds, since they could only miss on a natural 1. So there you go. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Gelatinous cube tpk
Top