Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Gencon 2010 Pathfinder Seminars - DOWNLOADABLE!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steel_Wind" data-source="post: 5279379" data-attributes="member: 20741"><p>Thanks for the kind words.</p><p></p><p> As for future episodes, our immediate plans underwent some changes as a result of Gencon and listener feedback received at Indy. </p><p> </p><p>A lot of listeners indicated they were interested in hearing about <em>Council of Thieves</em>, but there seemed to be a lot more immediate interest in hearing about <em>Kingmaker</em> *RIGHT NOW*, too. This is especially so given that the sixth volume of <em>Kingmaker</em> was released at Gencon and some GMs who had deferred running the <em>Kingmaker</em> campaign until it was complete are now chomping at the bit to get started. </p><p> </p><p>It’s always about the “new thing”, rarely about the old thing. And right now, <em>Kingmaker</em> is new and <em>Council of Thieves</em> is “old.” </p><p> </p><p>So what we plan to do is cover each of the six volumes of <em>Council of Thieves</em> and the six volumes of <em>Kingmaker</em> in alternating “Adventure Path” episodes of the podcast. So we’ll do <em>Bastards of Erebus</em> (CoT #1) in one episode, then a stand alone module in the next episode, then <em>Stolen Lands</em> (Kingmaker #1) in the next episode, then another stand alone module, then <em>Six-Fold Trial</em> (Cot #2), another stand alone, back to <em>Kingmaker #2</em>... You get the idea. </p><p> </p><p>The reason we don't want to do all 6 volumes of an Adventure Path one after the other like we did with the <em>Price of Immortality Trilogy</em> relates to the speed of our own Adventure Path based home campaigns. Reading the module with a reviewer’s eye while looking for continuity and XP issues is helpful to listeners; however, we believe listeners appreciate the additional insight that personal experience provides when running and playing the module. In order to get that personal experience some listeners value, we need the time to progress in our <em>Council of Thieves</em> and <em>Kingmaker</em> campaigns (of which there are 2 of each currently underway among the hosts).</p><p></p><p> Alternating <em>Council of Thieves</em> and <em>Kingmaker</em> reviews every other episode allows us to do both in a more timely fashion, while still giving us enough time to finish running them. At least -- that’s the hope, We’ll see how it works out in practice. </p><p></p><p> With respect to the specific question – we plan to devote an episode to each volume in a given AP. So there will be six episodes devoted to <em>Council of Thieves</em> and six to <em>Kingmaker</em>. If we find that’s too much time spent on just one AP, we’ll adjust our plans and trim them.</p><p> </p><p>Hmm. Not a bad idea, but I think we’ll have to leave something like that into our second year at least. I’m not sure our collective opinions on that subject right now are sufficiently informed – or at least as informed as they could (and should) be before we try something like that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steel_Wind, post: 5279379, member: 20741"] Thanks for the kind words. As for future episodes, our immediate plans underwent some changes as a result of Gencon and listener feedback received at Indy. A lot of listeners indicated they were interested in hearing about [I]Council of Thieves[/I], but there seemed to be a lot more immediate interest in hearing about [I]Kingmaker[/I] *RIGHT NOW*, too. This is especially so given that the sixth volume of [I]Kingmaker[/I] was released at Gencon and some GMs who had deferred running the [I]Kingmaker[/I] campaign until it was complete are now chomping at the bit to get started. It’s always about the “new thing”, rarely about the old thing. And right now, [I]Kingmaker[/I] is new and [I]Council of Thieves[/I] is “old.” So what we plan to do is cover each of the six volumes of [I]Council of Thieves[/I] and the six volumes of [I]Kingmaker[/I] in alternating “Adventure Path” episodes of the podcast. So we’ll do [I]Bastards of Erebus[/I] (CoT #1) in one episode, then a stand alone module in the next episode, then [I]Stolen Lands[/I] (Kingmaker #1) in the next episode, then another stand alone module, then [I]Six-Fold Trial[/I] (Cot #2), another stand alone, back to [I]Kingmaker #2[/I]... You get the idea. The reason we don't want to do all 6 volumes of an Adventure Path one after the other like we did with the [I]Price of Immortality Trilogy[/I] relates to the speed of our own Adventure Path based home campaigns. Reading the module with a reviewer’s eye while looking for continuity and XP issues is helpful to listeners; however, we believe listeners appreciate the additional insight that personal experience provides when running and playing the module. In order to get that personal experience some listeners value, we need the time to progress in our [I]Council of Thieves[/I] and [I]Kingmaker[/I] campaigns (of which there are 2 of each currently underway among the hosts). Alternating [I]Council of Thieves[/I] and [I]Kingmaker[/I] reviews every other episode allows us to do both in a more timely fashion, while still giving us enough time to finish running them. At least -- that’s the hope, We’ll see how it works out in practice. With respect to the specific question – we plan to devote an episode to each volume in a given AP. So there will be six episodes devoted to [I]Council of Thieves[/I] and six to [I]Kingmaker[/I]. If we find that’s too much time spent on just one AP, we’ll adjust our plans and trim them. Hmm. Not a bad idea, but I think we’ll have to leave something like that into our second year at least. I’m not sure our collective opinions on that subject right now are sufficiently informed – or at least as informed as they could (and should) be before we try something like that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Gencon 2010 Pathfinder Seminars - DOWNLOADABLE!
Top