Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Marshall" data-source="post: 5653970" data-attributes="member: 765">Yes, choosing not to choose is a choice. And that choice includes ALL your available options which are more numerous and significantly more complex than a 4e class.Uh, you do realize that its the 4e classes that actually have a filing system while the e-classes throw everything into one pot? 4e already had the AEDU silos that broke everything down into manageable bits.??? Why would you make that assumption?Humbug,All you are doing there is parsing the decision making process differently.1. Choose a target(4 options)2. Choose a power(5 options)Sure, but now you are actually into the complex encounter powers that 'simple' players arent going to select.My mistake, I misremembered the number of Thiefs Tricks. Its only 2.5 times the number of at-wills that a Rogue has to play with.You're not throwing in any decision point here. The e-class has to make the same decision, just with different and more complex choices.Not really, no. Both types of wibble-wonky are distracting, time-consuming and unproductive.  No, I'm saying the poor player who thinks he has a simple class is going to be out of his depth the first time he is reduced to 0hp and has to decide between standing and activating a stance or an aura or attacking or...So is a Swordmage, didnt stop the new "Everything is a Wizard" design paradigm from taking over the Bladesinger.Please, NO. The poor Sorc already has enough of his design space stolen by the Wizard and no real support outside a couple Dragon articles for the Chaos Mage. Making the Sorc an Abyssal Pact warlock is almost as bad an idea as an article on weapon powers for him.</blockquote>

Verification