Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="JamesonCourage" data-source="post: 5560544" data-attributes="member: 6668292">Let's keep in mind, however, that enjoyment is exceptionally subjective. I think the people in this thread that have been in favor of discussion (and not even necessarily implementation!) are more in the right than those who seem to imply that the discussion should not even take place.If all you're saying is that it wouldn't be fun for you if you play, then I totally get that. We're on the same page, in that the game wouldn't be right for you. I think it's fair for others to discuss it, however, even if they have no specific rules they are planning on implementing.As always, play what you like <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />I'm all for you playing the type of game that appeals to you. Sounds like you have an open mind on the matter. I just don't want the discussion in this thread shut down unnecessarily, when it could lead to interesting results. I think what Celebrim and I have briefly discussed in terms of a (now some-what stackable?) free feat is interesting. I think his implementation of optional character traits that help distinguish the sexes is interesting.I'd prefer we see what other interesting ways of implementation there can be, without the needless claims of "perceived sexism" by others in this thread (others, as in not from you).Again, play what you like <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification