Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Myrdin Potter" data-source="post: 8974629" data-attributes="member: 6843593">I play Swords and Wizardry (0e D&amp;D) and plenty of old school games. I don’t need to be told that games with fewer rules can be fun.You asked me why I answered the way I did. You counter points do not echo with me, I honestly think that you are exaggerating the other way. I have sat at tables with experienced DCC players and had rules argued. One of the main DCC podcasts is on RAW. You handwaving RAW like it does not matter is not true for many, many players. I want to play RAW and then slowly change it over time to suit my group. But RAW has to hold together. In DCC’s case, the RAW rules are actually fairly solid.I strongly recommend that people give DCC a shot. It is a fun flavour of D&amp;D and I played 8 hours of DCC type games at GaryCon. I have played DCC at every GaryCon and 100% had a good experience. That does not mean that I do not find it to be the greatest system for an ongoing campaign.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Myrdin Potter, post: 8974629, member: 6843593"] I play Swords and Wizardry (0e D&D) and plenty of old school games. I don’t need to be told that games with fewer rules can be fun. You asked me why I answered the way I did. You counter points do not echo with me, I honestly think that you are exaggerating the other way. I have sat at tables with experienced DCC players and had rules argued. One of the main DCC podcasts is on RAW. You handwaving RAW like it does not matter is not true for many, many players. I want to play RAW and then slowly change it over time to suit my group. But RAW has to hold together. In DCC’s case, the RAW rules are actually fairly solid. I strongly recommend that people give DCC a shot. It is a fun flavour of D&D and I played 8 hours of DCC type games at GaryCon. I have played DCC at every GaryCon and 100% had a good experience. That does not mean that I do not find it to be the greatest system for an ongoing campaign. [/QUOTE]

Verification