Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Generation: rolling vs. point buy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nefrast" data-source="post: 3679608" data-attributes="member: 48209"><p>We use point-buy because it's very fair as everyone starts out with the same "value" of attributes, and his highly customizable to ensure you can play the character you want (sans the "everywhere 18s überchar").</p><p></p><p>Sébastien Loise from the math department of Mc Gill, CA once did a mathematical comparison of the point-buy system and rolling methods. Sadly the paper "www.math.mcgill.ca/~loisel/dnd-stats.html" is no longer there.</p><p></p><p>He found out "that the standard PHB rolling method yields characters with an average point-buy value of 30.92312858 and a standard deviation of 7.708473537 which 75% of characters having a point-buy value in the range from 23 to 40 (inclusive). The highest probability accors at 28 points, and half the characters have a point-buy value of 30 or less".</p><p>...</p><p>"The conclusion is that the standard PHB rolling method will rarely yield really low point-value characters, and often yield characters of a point value somewhere around 31".</p><p></p><p></p><p>I think this is very interesting, and also part of the reason why our group uses the 32-point buy variant and not the 25-point one.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nefrast, post: 3679608, member: 48209"] We use point-buy because it's very fair as everyone starts out with the same "value" of attributes, and his highly customizable to ensure you can play the character you want (sans the "everywhere 18s überchar"). Sébastien Loise from the math department of Mc Gill, CA once did a mathematical comparison of the point-buy system and rolling methods. Sadly the paper "www.math.mcgill.ca/~loisel/dnd-stats.html" is no longer there. He found out "that the standard PHB rolling method yields characters with an average point-buy value of 30.92312858 and a standard deviation of 7.708473537 which 75% of characters having a point-buy value in the range from 23 to 40 (inclusive). The highest probability accors at 28 points, and half the characters have a point-buy value of 30 or less". ... "The conclusion is that the standard PHB rolling method will rarely yield really low point-value characters, and often yield characters of a point value somewhere around 31". I think this is very interesting, and also part of the reason why our group uses the 32-point buy variant and not the 25-point one. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Generation: rolling vs. point buy
Top