Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Maxperson" data-source="post: 6868220" data-attributes="member: 23751">First, I asked you and you dodged and then asked me.&nbsp; You don't get to expect me to answer first, so.......after you.&nbsp; Second, it's a fact that rules don't have to have mechanics attached to them.&nbsp; Grocery stores have rules on which doors you go in and out of.&nbsp; I ignore those rules routinely because there are no mechanics attached and nothing will happen if I don't go by the rule.&nbsp; Third, it's not silly at all.&nbsp; You made a claim that the ONLY rules are ones with mechanics.&nbsp; I didn't make the claim that everything in the book was a rule.&nbsp; Only you are asking for something silly, as well as claiming something silly.You used insanity in two instances to represent a 5 int score.&nbsp; That's using insanity to measure int, since without that insanity, your examples would have genius level int scores.&nbsp; The same with love and the charisma descriptive.&nbsp; Int isn't measuring them, they are measuring the int.Not mine.&nbsp; You're the one claiming all kinds of bizarre things like, &quot;I can fail my save and act like I made it, even though the spell says the caster knows that I failed, then I can lie even though I have to tell the truth.&quot; in order to keep your idea going.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Maxperson, post: 6868220, member: 23751"] First, I asked you and you dodged and then asked me. You don't get to expect me to answer first, so.......after you. Second, it's a fact that rules don't have to have mechanics attached to them. Grocery stores have rules on which doors you go in and out of. I ignore those rules routinely because there are no mechanics attached and nothing will happen if I don't go by the rule. Third, it's not silly at all. You made a claim that the ONLY rules are ones with mechanics. I didn't make the claim that everything in the book was a rule. Only you are asking for something silly, as well as claiming something silly. You used insanity in two instances to represent a 5 int score. That's using insanity to measure int, since without that insanity, your examples would have genius level int scores. The same with love and the charisma descriptive. Int isn't measuring them, they are measuring the int. Not mine. You're the one claiming all kinds of bizarre things like, "I can fail my save and act like I made it, even though the spell says the caster knows that I failed, then I can lie even though I have to tell the truth." in order to keep your idea going. [/QUOTE]

Verification