Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Geniuses with 5 Int
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Guest 6801328" data-source="post: 6873442"><p>So are you saying that fireballs <strong>are not able to</strong> set combustibles alight by default? I don't see anything in the description that says it won't. Which leaves us in the curious position that if the player asks, "Does the fireball set the oil-drenched straw alight?" to even answer the question is making up a house rule.</p><p></p><p>In an earlier post you made a reference to the PHB being "the Bible" or a "sacred text" or something of that nature. I assume you were/are being a little bit facetious, but there does seem to be a little bit of that going on. </p><p></p><p>To continue the analogy, BoldItalic and I are reading the "Bible" and saying, "Hey, that was a good story and although it's not true it's a good parable for how we should treat our neighbors." And it seems like you are saying, "No! Every single word is the word of God and is literally, exactly true!"</p><p></p><p>And that's fine. You're free to interpret the PHB such that every single sentence, even the vague & ambiguous ones, are "rules" (including that Oath Paladins <em>must</em> put angelic wings on their helm or shield, otherwise they are house ruling), but...to go all meta on you here...there is no "rule" in the PHB saying that every sentence is a literal rule. You are choosing to read it that way. </p><p></p><p>What you are failing to do is acknowledge that this is your choice, and that it is an optional choice. (Which, of course, is exactly what happens in real-life religious debates: the atheists & heretics say, "That's cool...you interpret it your way, we'll interpret it our way" while the zealots & fanatics say, "No! There <em>is only one valid way</em>!")</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You're the only one changing mechanics here. Eloelle failed her original Int check so she doesn't know the answer to the Riddle. If you want to enable ZoT to extract the answer to the Riddle anyway then you are changing the mechanics of the game, and/or creating paradoxes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Guest 6801328, post: 6873442"] So are you saying that fireballs [B]are not able to[/B] set combustibles alight by default? I don't see anything in the description that says it won't. Which leaves us in the curious position that if the player asks, "Does the fireball set the oil-drenched straw alight?" to even answer the question is making up a house rule. In an earlier post you made a reference to the PHB being "the Bible" or a "sacred text" or something of that nature. I assume you were/are being a little bit facetious, but there does seem to be a little bit of that going on. To continue the analogy, BoldItalic and I are reading the "Bible" and saying, "Hey, that was a good story and although it's not true it's a good parable for how we should treat our neighbors." And it seems like you are saying, "No! Every single word is the word of God and is literally, exactly true!" And that's fine. You're free to interpret the PHB such that every single sentence, even the vague & ambiguous ones, are "rules" (including that Oath Paladins [I]must[/I] put angelic wings on their helm or shield, otherwise they are house ruling), but...to go all meta on you here...there is no "rule" in the PHB saying that every sentence is a literal rule. You are choosing to read it that way. What you are failing to do is acknowledge that this is your choice, and that it is an optional choice. (Which, of course, is exactly what happens in real-life religious debates: the atheists & heretics say, "That's cool...you interpret it your way, we'll interpret it our way" while the zealots & fanatics say, "No! There [I]is only one valid way[/I]!") You're the only one changing mechanics here. Eloelle failed her original Int check so she doesn't know the answer to the Riddle. If you want to enable ZoT to extract the answer to the Riddle anyway then you are changing the mechanics of the game, and/or creating paradoxes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Geniuses with 5 Int
Top