Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Genre Conventions: What is fantasy?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wayside" data-source="post: 2298180" data-attributes="member: 8394"><p>You probably want to reread the posts in question (there's more than the 1 line I quoted and responded to directly), as bifurcation is not an issue in my statement. "Who in the rainbow can draw the line where the violet tint ends and the orange tint begins?" asks Melville; "Distinctly we see the differences of the colors, but where exactly does the one first blendingly enter into the other?" I know that position by heart--sadly it has nothing to do with what I said. In fact Dannyalcatraz's argument <em>against</em> definition relies more on dichotomizing, because he mistakes the idea that all writing is mixed for the idea that no writing is definable. In order for writing to be mixed, it has to be a mix of something. If the something it's a mix of is merely a mix of something else and so on, we might as well stop talking and just wave our fingers menacingly, since behind every word is another word and we can never get anywhere that way.</p><p></p><p>SF and F don't have to be opposed to one another for us to define them. It's a question of content, not polarity. We don't need the equivalent of a spectrum of colors to think about them, though that is precisely what an aesthetic approach, like imagery, wants to require in some formulations. No, defining SF and F in terms of imagery is no less problematic than defining it in any other way. We just aren't examining the imagery very closely here; that is to say, it's easier to handwave "I'll know it when I see it" arguments when we're talking about something as simple as whether or not there are spaceships. If you really sit down and try to hammer out an image-based definition, you're going to run into just as many problems as you would looking for a thematic or plot-based genre continuity--as if it were any easier to tell SF from F, at a certain middle point, than it is orange from red, as you say. You're actually making my point for me in a different way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wayside, post: 2298180, member: 8394"] You probably want to reread the posts in question (there's more than the 1 line I quoted and responded to directly), as bifurcation is not an issue in my statement. "Who in the rainbow can draw the line where the violet tint ends and the orange tint begins?" asks Melville; "Distinctly we see the differences of the colors, but where exactly does the one first blendingly enter into the other?" I know that position by heart--sadly it has nothing to do with what I said. In fact Dannyalcatraz's argument [I]against[/I] definition relies more on dichotomizing, because he mistakes the idea that all writing is mixed for the idea that no writing is definable. In order for writing to be mixed, it has to be a mix of something. If the something it's a mix of is merely a mix of something else and so on, we might as well stop talking and just wave our fingers menacingly, since behind every word is another word and we can never get anywhere that way. SF and F don't have to be opposed to one another for us to define them. It's a question of content, not polarity. We don't need the equivalent of a spectrum of colors to think about them, though that is precisely what an aesthetic approach, like imagery, wants to require in some formulations. No, defining SF and F in terms of imagery is no less problematic than defining it in any other way. We just aren't examining the imagery very closely here; that is to say, it's easier to handwave "I'll know it when I see it" arguments when we're talking about something as simple as whether or not there are spaceships. If you really sit down and try to hammer out an image-based definition, you're going to run into just as many problems as you would looking for a thematic or plot-based genre continuity--as if it were any easier to tell SF from F, at a certain middle point, than it is orange from red, as you say. You're actually making my point for me in a different way. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Genre Conventions: What is fantasy?
Top