Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Empirate" data-source="post: 5554429" data-attributes="member: 78958">Visigani, your point has been brought up time and again on this and similar boards. It has, after much discussion, always been shot down. You may play it differently in your game, of course, but this really isn't a unique, new argument you're making, I'm sorry to say.Geomancer does not advance Mystic Theurge casting, because Mystic Theurge doesn't per se have casting. Both do the same: they advance other classes' casting. Mystic Theurge does it in a different way from Geomancer, in that it advances two other classes' casting. Geomancer does not do this.You can either accept that this is the result of common internet D&amp;D knowledge (for what that's worth), give a sigh for your interesting idea, and move on - or you can engage people here in what must ultimately be a fruitless debate.I sincerely hope you're not offended by this, nor by Dandu's sometimes abrasive manner. Welcome to ENWorld!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Empirate, post: 5554429, member: 78958"] Visigani, your point has been brought up time and again on this and similar boards. It has, after much discussion, always been shot down. You may play it differently in your game, of course, but this really isn't a unique, new argument you're making, I'm sorry to say. Geomancer does not advance Mystic Theurge casting, because Mystic Theurge doesn't per se [I]have [/I]casting. Both do the same: they [I]advance[/I] other classes' casting. Mystic Theurge does it in a different way from Geomancer, in that it advances two other classes' casting. Geomancer does not do this. You can either accept that this is the result of common internet D&D knowledge (for what that's worth), give a sigh for your interesting idea, and move on - or you can engage people here in what must ultimately be a fruitless debate. I sincerely hope you're not offended by this, nor by Dandu's sometimes abrasive manner. Welcome to ENWorld! [/QUOTE]

Verification