Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Drifter Bob" data-source="post: 1625453" data-attributes="member: 17723">I'm honestly expressing my opinion of the results.  You on ther other hand seem to be lashing out defensively.  Let me ask you a question:  Do you use house rules?First, not a gripe.  This is IMO defensiveness again.  Like I said before, like it or not (and I'm sure, most DnD players dont like it and would want everything to stay exactly as is) DnD WILL change.  A DnD 4E WILL come out.  The only question is then, how it will change.  Making a suggestion for areas which could use improvements when this change is inevitably made is not a gripe .  Labeling it as such is just a facile way to dismiss it.Also, I never claimed this was a definitive scientific analysis.  (WOTC would have to pay me big money to conduct that! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />)  But I think it is informative.If you sold guns in breakfast cereal boxes, or if they manufactured guns in gang banger colors, or let serial kiillers endorse them, then it would have a moral position on it's use.  DnD is sold and marketed to kids, the rules are bent accordingly, both in mechanics and flavor.  How do you answer Oourphs points...?DB</blockquote>