Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="mirivor" data-source="post: 3157401" data-attributes="member: 7478">"I haven't seen any arguements that refute the logic that Feeblemind's text doesn't say the list is comprehensive...."Yes you have, if you read my post. Where in the book does it say that I cannot use my climb skill to make attack rolls? Where in the book does it say that I cannot roll 5d8 for my Cure Light Wounds at 1st level? Where in the book does it say that I cannot use my spellcraft skill to craft a masterwork sword? These are all ludicrous ideas, yet no where in the books are they specifically spelled out. It is taken for granted that because base attack bonus is used to make attacks, then my climb skill is not. The people that are arguing for Break Enchantment on the grounds that Feeblemind's list  is not specified as "exclusive" have no basis from which to argue that point. There is no prior examples set in the books. The entire ruleset has the assumption that if a book says that component X is used for component why, then that is the way it is. Now, as for arguing based on Break Enchantment's text, that is a logical and reasonable idea. I would not refute the points made from that stand.</blockquote>