Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Get pedantic on Feeblemind
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Artoomis" data-source="post: 3158644" data-attributes="member: 111"><p>edit: This is kind of long, but it brings all of my arguments together, I think</p><p></p><p>"...Allowing a 5th-level wizard spell to remove the effect, simply because of pedantry or player whining, is an unacceptable weakening of the spell" No, it's just applying Break Enchantment as written, plus realizing that for an instantenous spell such a list is permissive rather than restrictive (or, if you like inclusive rather than exclusive).</p><p></p><p>Let's look at which fifth level or lower "instantaneous enchantments" actually exist in the PHB, for Break Enchantment is meant to apply to all of those.</p><p></p><p>Let's see, there is:</p><p></p><p>Feeblemind Sor/Wiz 5 and... oh, look, that’s it! The only one. (edit: I searched the "Hyperlinked SRD." If I missed somehting please let me know.) </p><p></p><p>That alone is evidence fairly strong evidence that Break Enchantment should work on Feeblemind, <strong><em><u>It is the only PHB spell that is an instantaneous enchantment that could be affected by Break Enchantment.</u></em></strong></p><p></p><p>The argument that the "feebleminded state" can only be removed as stated in the spell falls apart very quickly, as I have shown. </p><p></p><p>There are other ways that one can remove the feebleminded state, even if rather inefficiently (such as magically raising the stats and/or even slowing raising them by level advancement). </p><p></p><p>Since <strong><em><u>that</u></em></strong> is true, the list presented <strong><em><u>cannot</u></em></strong> be an exclusive list. </p><p></p><p>Since <strong><em><u>that</u></em></strong> is true, Break Enchantment <strong><em><u>must</u></em></strong> work.</p><p></p><p><strong><em><u>An instantaneous effect, by definition, leaves behind no magic that can control its ongoing effect.</u></em></strong>. This is a very key point Because of this fact, any language about what can remove the instantaneous effect must be permissive, rather that restrictive. In other words, it’s removing the normal restriction that one can pretty much do nothing to reverse “instantaneous” effect. Feeblemind list some ways one can do this, but Break Enchantment lists another. By the logic above, and because Feeblemind is the ONLY fifth level or lower instantaneous enchantment in the PHB, Break Enchantment must be able to work.</p><p></p><p>If not, the whole logic above must have a fatal flaw somewhere <u>(please point it out to me)</u> and, to top it off, the “fifth level or lower instantaneous enchantment” portion of Break Enchantment must have no meaning, at least as far as the PHB is concerned, and that is not really acceptable to me.</p><p></p><p>edit: Unfortunately a quick surface reading for Feeblemind would lead one to a conclusion that ONLY those spells listed work to "fix" the feebleminded.</p><p></p><p>That's unfortunate, especially lin light of the fact that NONE of those spells needed to be listed. That's because Heal already explicity states it "immediately ends... the adverse condition..." of feeblemind, and the others all can be used in place of Break Enchantment anyway. It would have been better (clearer) to have no such text at all in the Feeblemind spell description.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Artoomis, post: 3158644, member: 111"] edit: This is kind of long, but it brings all of my arguments together, I think "...Allowing a 5th-level wizard spell to remove the effect, simply because of pedantry or player whining, is an unacceptable weakening of the spell" No, it's just applying Break Enchantment as written, plus realizing that for an instantenous spell such a list is permissive rather than restrictive (or, if you like inclusive rather than exclusive). Let's look at which fifth level or lower "instantaneous enchantments" actually exist in the PHB, for Break Enchantment is meant to apply to all of those. Let's see, there is: Feeblemind Sor/Wiz 5 and... oh, look, that’s it! The only one. (edit: I searched the "Hyperlinked SRD." If I missed somehting please let me know.) That alone is evidence fairly strong evidence that Break Enchantment should work on Feeblemind, [b][i][u]It is the only PHB spell that is an instantaneous enchantment that could be affected by Break Enchantment.[/u][/i][/b][i][u][/u][/i][u][/u] The argument that the "feebleminded state" can only be removed as stated in the spell falls apart very quickly, as I have shown. There are other ways that one can remove the feebleminded state, even if rather inefficiently (such as magically raising the stats and/or even slowing raising them by level advancement). Since [b][i][u]that[/u][/i][/b][i][u][/u][/i][u][/u] is true, the list presented [b][i][u]cannot[/u][/i][/b][i][u][/u][/i][u][/u] be an exclusive list. Since [b][i][u]that[/u][/i][/b][i][u][/u][/i][u][/u] is true, Break Enchantment [b][i][u]must[/u][/i][/b][i][u][/u][/i][u][/u] work. [b][i][u]An instantaneous effect, by definition, leaves behind no magic that can control its ongoing effect.[/u][/i][/b][i][u][/u][/i][u][/u]. This is a very key point Because of this fact, any language about what can remove the instantaneous effect must be permissive, rather that restrictive. In other words, it’s removing the normal restriction that one can pretty much do nothing to reverse “instantaneous” effect. Feeblemind list some ways one can do this, but Break Enchantment lists another. By the logic above, and because Feeblemind is the ONLY fifth level or lower instantaneous enchantment in the PHB, Break Enchantment must be able to work. If not, the whole logic above must have a fatal flaw somewhere [u](please point it out to me)[/u] and, to top it off, the “fifth level or lower instantaneous enchantment” portion of Break Enchantment must have no meaning, at least as far as the PHB is concerned, and that is not really acceptable to me. edit: Unfortunately a quick surface reading for Feeblemind would lead one to a conclusion that ONLY those spells listed work to "fix" the feebleminded. That's unfortunate, especially lin light of the fact that NONE of those spells needed to be listed. That's because Heal already explicity states it "immediately ends... the adverse condition..." of feeblemind, and the others all can be used in place of Break Enchantment anyway. It would have been better (clearer) to have no such text at all in the Feeblemind spell description. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Get pedantic on Feeblemind
Top