Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Cedric" data-source="post: 3162031" data-attributes="member: 2044">Regardless, this along with Imprisonment sets the very clear precedent that consequences of an instantaneous effect can have specific removal requirements. So that negates that part of your argument. Still, you've not addressed my question as to why Break Enchantment, which is from the same publication as Feeblemind, Heal, Wish, Limited Wish and Miracle, should be allowed to function when it was not on the list of cures. You have stated yourself that the list is redundant, there was no need to have both Limited Wish and Wish on the list, since Wish can copy Limited Wish. So, if the list is careful to be redundant in that regard, why would it leave out a possible cure from the same book...unless, that possible cure was not intended to function as a cure for Feeblemind? If you can answer that to my satisfaction, I'll agree your argument has merit.</blockquote>