Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Artoomis" data-source="post: 3162497" data-attributes="member: 111">Nope. Note that the word "can" is needed because it is not automatic. First, of course, it must an enchantment, abjuration or curse.Second, it must be no hgigher than fifth level (that's arguable and does nto matter here)Third, the Caster Level check must be successful.Fourth, there nust not be some other rule that would prevent this from taking happening.If all those are true, that it reverses the instantaneous effect.The tricky bit is number four, of course.Whether or not the spell list within Feeblemind represents a rule that can possibly prevent the revesal hinges on the defintion of "reverse." nIf "reverse' meas that the spell effect essentially never happens (it is "unraveled," for lack of a better term), than there is no spell effect to contain the "spell list" text and the "spell list" cannot prevent Break Enchantment from working.On the other hand, if you take the word "reverse" to have it mean something more akin to "cure," then perhaps the spell list does exclude Break Enchantment, depending upon other arguments (with which I do not agree, but that's beside the point here).Unfortuantely, we have no guidance other than ordinary English to decide what "reverse" means in this instance.</blockquote>