Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Artoomis" data-source="post: 3167230" data-attributes="member: 111">There can be no doubt whatsosever that Mass Heal is not on the list, can there?The list is not Heal &quot;and spells that act like Heal&quot;... It is Heal, ...In fact one could even argue that Mass Heal does NOT work because it was left off the list (I woudn't, as it would be a ludicrously weak argument).You have to do SOMETHING to the list to have Mass Heal work.&nbsp; Mass Heal is unquestionably NOT the same spell as Heal.Sure it &quot;functions like heal,&quot; but it is clearly it's own spell with it's own entry in the PHB spell list.Again, I do not argue that Mass Heal does not work - I think it does, of course,&nbsp; But, one must expand the list to allow it if one is to call the list truly exclusionary.That, of course, is the problem with attempting to have a 100% exclusionary list.&nbsp; It's too easy to have an oversight.That's why BE needs to be excluded by name for the exclusion to be valid.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Artoomis, post: 3167230, member: 111"] There can be no doubt whatsosever that Mass Heal is not on the list, can there? The list is not Heal "and spells that act like Heal"... It is Heal, ... In fact one could even argue that Mass Heal does NOT work because it was left off the list (I woudn't, as it would be a ludicrously weak argument). You have to do SOMETHING to the list to have Mass Heal work. Mass Heal is unquestionably NOT the same spell as Heal. Sure it "functions like heal," but it is clearly it's own spell with it's own entry in the PHB spell list. Again, I do not argue that Mass Heal does not work - I think it does, of course, But, one must expand the list to allow it if one is to call the list truly exclusionary. That, of course, is the problem with attempting to have a 100% exclusionary list. It's too easy to have an oversight. That's why BE needs to be excluded by name for the exclusion to be valid. [/QUOTE]

Verification