Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Nellisir" data-source="post: 3400986" data-attributes="member: 70">So, just WotC, Atlas Games, Green Ronin, Bastion Press, and (I think) AEG (which I know didn't really do a monster book other than Creatures of Rokugan, where the names mostly were protected -- but there were monsters in other books and I think those names were open.&nbsp; AEG was pretty darned cool with their OGC.)I'm sure there are pdf publishers also, but I'd have to look at declarations and I'm busy at the moment.As far as WotC goes...I don't expect any more updates to the SRD for...probably a year.&nbsp; And if not then, probably never again.&nbsp; It all depends on how much value WotC thinks they derived from the SRD &amp; OGL the first time around.I don't really care if WotC updates the SRD.&nbsp; I'm happy with plain old OGC.I think there are a number of reasons for the low level of reuse of OGC among publishers.&nbsp; I think the biggest ones are false, but I also think the easy answer isn't the right one either.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Nellisir, post: 3400986, member: 70"] So, just WotC, Atlas Games, Green Ronin, Bastion Press, and (I think) AEG ([I]which I know didn't really do a monster book other than Creatures of Rokugan, where the names mostly were protected -- but there were monsters in other books and I think those names were open. AEG was pretty darned cool with their OGC.[/I]) I'm sure there are pdf publishers also, but I'd have to look at declarations and I'm busy at the moment. As far as WotC goes...I don't expect any more updates to the SRD for...probably a year. And if not then, probably never again. It all depends on how much value WotC thinks they derived from the SRD & OGL the first time around. I don't really care if WotC updates the SRD. I'm happy with plain old OGC. I think there are a number of reasons for the low level of reuse of OGC among publishers. I think the biggest ones are false, but I also think the easy answer isn't the right one either. [/QUOTE]

Verification