Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Gez" data-source="post: 1220111" data-attributes="member: 1328">Or they would get 5th level spells. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> For my level re-evaluation, I've found spells that were like "Clr 5, Pal 4" for example, so I've felt free to put them to 5th level since Paladins would get them.I don't think it would be a good idea to change progression inside a class. That's unelegant.Class ability. A first level sorcerer gets two bonus cantrip slots. A third level sorcerer gets two bonus 1st-level spell slots. A fifth level sorcerer gets two bonus 2nd-level spell slots. And so on.Now they do. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Yes, their spellcasting capacity has overall increased. Possible balance issue there, but I don't think it will be anything too nasty.Well, it's an idea that has merits (and I think I saw it already on Monte Cook's boards, proposed to adress the same thing, stacking spellcasting multiclasses). But I prefer to keep a value increasing by one every so much levels, for consistency.</blockquote>