Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ARandomGod" data-source="post: 2439760" data-attributes="member: 17296">I see your point. Mine is simply that it doens't say Target: one creature. Rather it say: Effect: 1-ft.-diameter/level sphere, centered around a creature.In other words, while I agree that it doens't imply multiple creatures at all, indeed it implies a single creature, I'm also not going off the spells implications, but the spells listed effects.The effect is a shpere, one which must be centered on a creature, but really (even if the spell wasn't *designed* to catch more than one creature), the spell indeed can catch more than one creature. Otherwise you can use it to push a creature around. (What if I center the spell on that between the fighter and the monster, will it push the monster off the cliff? Will it smash the fighter??)Anything else seems to be reading something into it. Certainly the wizard who designed the spell meant for one critter to be affected. Just as clearly the spell creates a shpere of a certain size, with a creature at it's center. ... The size can be enough to enclose multiple creatures.Emphasis mine...It does refer to one subject all the time. Well, other than that once at the end. That's either all flavor text or none, however. It could be a typo!  <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/paranoid.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":uhoh:" title="Paranoid    :uhoh:" data-shortname=":uhoh:" /> But really, while the spell was clearly designed to catch only one target, saying that it can ONLY catch one target seems to be a house-rule to me.</blockquote>

Verification