Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
ghoul touch mechanics question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="evilbob" data-source="post: 2975300" data-attributes="member: 9789"><p>The spell <em>Ghoul Touch</em> requires a melee touch attack to affect a creature. In the spell summary, the spell lists under saves "Fortitude Negates." In the spell description, two effects are listed: paralysis on the creature hit with a melee touch attack, and a separate sickening effect on surrounding creatures (other than the caster). The sickening effect is specifically described with "(Fortitude negates)" in the spell description; the paralysis effect is not.</p><p></p><p>My question is: is the paralysis effect also subject to a Fort save, or if the spell "hits," does that mean the creature affected is paralyzed without a save (the save is effectively the chance to hit, like <em>Scorching Ray</em> and the damage-only part of <em>Chill Touch</em>)? The two lines of reasoning are: 1) all other spells that list "Fortitude negates" in the summary typically mean all aspects of the spell, so both aspects of this spell require a save and can be negated; and 2) since the spell description specifically mentions that the sickening effect is "Fortitude negates" and does not mention it for the paralysis effect, the "Fortitude negates" line in the spell summary only refers to the second effect of the spell.</p><p></p><p>There may be many other arguments as well. There also seem to be spell precedents set on both sides. Other thoughts?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="evilbob, post: 2975300, member: 9789"] The spell [I]Ghoul Touch[/I] requires a melee touch attack to affect a creature. In the spell summary, the spell lists under saves "Fortitude Negates." In the spell description, two effects are listed: paralysis on the creature hit with a melee touch attack, and a separate sickening effect on surrounding creatures (other than the caster). The sickening effect is specifically described with "(Fortitude negates)" in the spell description; the paralysis effect is not. My question is: is the paralysis effect also subject to a Fort save, or if the spell "hits," does that mean the creature affected is paralyzed without a save (the save is effectively the chance to hit, like [I]Scorching Ray[/I] and the damage-only part of [I]Chill Touch[/I])? The two lines of reasoning are: 1) all other spells that list "Fortitude negates" in the summary typically mean all aspects of the spell, so both aspects of this spell require a save and can be negated; and 2) since the spell description specifically mentions that the sickening effect is "Fortitude negates" and does not mention it for the paralysis effect, the "Fortitude negates" line in the spell summary only refers to the second effect of the spell. There may be many other arguments as well. There also seem to be spell precedents set on both sides. Other thoughts? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
ghoul touch mechanics question
Top