Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Nail" data-source="post: 3297835" data-attributes="member: 224">I, too, can't find the specific rule (or rules interp. in the FAQ or RotG or errata or...<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />).The problem (Med. creature grappled by Larger or larger creature) has three competing sub-problems:
<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Spell AoE: if the Large creature has just one of its squares covered, is the Medium creature in the AoE too?&nbsp; Or perhaps does it have some probability to be in the AoE? 
</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Missile Attacks: if an archer targets the large creature, can he target &quot;one of the creatures squares&quot; that the Medium creature is not in, so as to avoid the chance of hitting the medium creature?&quot; 
</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Melee/touch attacks: if a melee attacker is adjacent to the Large creature, is it possible for the medium creature to NOT also be adjacent to the melee attacker.&nbsp; That is, could the medium creature be &quot;on the other side&quot; of the large creature, in one of the &quot;far&quot; squares?</li>
</ul>All three of these situations have/will come up IMG.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Nail, post: 3297835, member: 224"] I, too, can't find the specific rule (or rules interp. in the FAQ or RotG or errata or...:)). The problem (Med. creature grappled by Larger or larger creature) has three competing sub-problems:[list][*][B]Spell AoE[/B]: if the Large creature has just one of its squares covered, is the Medium creature in the AoE too? Or perhaps does it have some probability to be in the AoE? [*][B]Missile Attacks[/B]: if an archer targets the large creature, can he target "one of the creatures squares" that the Medium creature is not in, so as to avoid the chance of hitting the medium creature?" [*][B]Melee/touch attacks[/B]: if a melee attacker is adjacent to the Large creature, is it possible for the medium creature to NOT also be adjacent to the melee attacker. That is, could the medium creature be "on the other side" of the large creature, in one of the "far" squares?[/list] All three of these situations have/will come up IMG. [/QUOTE]

Verification