Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Conaill" data-source="post: 2836120" data-attributes="member: 1264">We actually had a discussion about this very topic over in <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forumdisplay.php?f=27" target="_blank">General Monster Talk</a> not too long ago. I think it got lost in The Great Wipe of 2006, but IIRC the general consensus was that, yeah, WotC should have made the Giants larger in the first place. These are definitely *not* your traditional giants from mythology or fairy tales.Personally, I think Huge is a reasonable default size for Giants, with perhaps just as many Giant races smaller (i.e. Large - maybe call them half-giants?) or larger than that.To at least partially rectify the situation, we've drawn up <a href="http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=161554" target="_blank">"traditional" Gargantuan Giant</a> - one that might not be out of place in a "Jack and the Beanstalk" scenario, for example. It's essentially somewhere in between the Large Hill Giant and the Collosal Mountain Giant.Note that we're also currently working on a <a href="http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=161552" target="_blank">Giant by Poll</a> project - also Gargantuan, but that's pretty much where all similarity stops...</blockquote>