NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 6025753" data-attributes="member: 4937">I went looking for this 'rash in the last page or two' that bothers you so much specifically to try to understand who you were responding to and why.  I didn't see it.  I just went and checked again, and I still didn't see it.  Everyone that I saw that mentioned size or weight specifically mentioned problems other than biomechanics.  Ergo, I assumed you'd decided to tell everyone 'this is a badwrongfun discussion and you shouldn't engage in it'. Answers:1) Yes, apparantly they do.  Do you really care that much that they care?2) Maybe.  Use them and tell us how it goes.3) If you don't use them, why does this thread interest you?But, ok perhaps I'm spectacularly missing the point; I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt.  Please explain what point you were trying to make when you said:Did you intend for someone to convince you your opinion of giants was wrong?  I don't get it.  Also, please explain what in this thread you were arguing against when you went off on this rant:I mean, that could be truly said to be a point tangental to the discussion but why then present this point as if it was a refutation of something pertinent to the discussion?  You seem to be the one that thinks 'bigger = more preposterous'.  How so?  What are you arguing against anyway?  It just seemed to me you were somewhere between responding to some other thread than the one I had just read and willfully misrespresenting other peoples opinions in order to launch on your  biomechanics discussion. :shrug:</blockquote>

Verification