Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BlueFin" data-source="post: 8934764" data-attributes="member: 7040011">That's your interpretation of what I wrote, and it's incorrect.&nbsp; I am posing the question as to whether people are arriving at their conclusions after applying at least some level of critical thought, or willingly accepting what KB is saying as truth without consideration.&nbsp; I am not saying one way or another is right or wrong (but given that's the conclusion you jumped to, the issue is yours).&nbsp; I can understand if people just want to move on, I just hope they have actually thought it through and realise the potential consequences. And I am seeing a lot of comments (here and elsewhere) that suggest people are willing to just accept what he is saying, and assume his answers are truthful, kind of like this one (because there is nothing written in the post that suggests any kind of questioning consideration, whereas in my post where I made an accusation regarding KB, I provided an example) -That's not a position I am willing to take (yet) because what I see is a corporate mouth piece telling everyone what they want to hear, while dodging some important questions with &quot;oh I wasn't there so I can't comment&quot; (which in my view is a completely unacceptable response if he wants to be taken seriously - given the role he is fulfilling, he should have found out the answers to those questions).&nbsp; But in terms of &quot;going on with our lives&quot;, I never stopped <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="😉" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" title="Winking face&nbsp; &nbsp; :wink:" data-shortname=":wink:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" />This remains to be seen.&nbsp; The energy is still high and plans of certain 3PPs appear to be going forward, and I certainly hope they get finished ... but whether they do actually go the distance remains to be seen.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BlueFin, post: 8934764, member: 7040011"] That's your interpretation of what I wrote, and it's incorrect. I am posing the question as to whether people are arriving at their conclusions after applying at least some level of critical thought, or willingly accepting what KB is saying as truth without consideration. I am not saying one way or another is right or wrong (but given that's the conclusion you jumped to, the issue is yours). I can understand if people just want to move on, I just hope they have actually thought it through and realise the potential consequences. And I am seeing a lot of comments (here and elsewhere) that suggest people [I]are[/I] willing to just accept what he is saying, and assume his answers are truthful, kind of like this one (because there is nothing written in the post that suggests any kind of questioning consideration, whereas in my post where I made an accusation regarding KB, I provided an example) - That's not a position I am willing to take (yet) because what I see is a corporate mouth piece telling everyone what they want to hear, while dodging some important questions with "oh I wasn't there so I can't comment" (which in my view is a completely unacceptable response if he wants to be taken seriously - given the role he is fulfilling, he [I]should have found out[/I] the answers to those questions). But in terms of "going on with our lives", I never stopped 😉 This remains to be seen. The energy is still high and plans of certain 3PPs appear to be going forward, and I certainly hope they get finished ... but whether they do actually go the distance remains to be seen. [/QUOTE]

Verification