Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Give me a competent arguement that WotC is "changing rules for the sake of change"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Morrus" data-source="post: 3787333" data-attributes="member: 1"><p>That one's too easy. Branding. Look & style. Differentiating 4th from 3rd. Making it feel fresh and new. </p><p></p><p>Branding is a very strong reason to do such a thing. It may not matter to you or me as a gamer, but it's a massively important factor in the survival of a product line.</p><p></p><p>What is highly amusing is that, by some peoples' definitions, there's no reason to get new artwork at all (well, there's no reason to make a new game: WotC, having published all the 3.5 books it can realisticallyprofit from, shoud do the right thing and roll over and die...) - just re-use the old art. Of course, we then cue the "WotC are ripping me off by selling me the same art twice!" waling and gnashing of teeth.</p><p></p><p>To a large extent, it doesn't matter what they do. People will be criticizing them for it, whatever. Change a lot of stuff and they're changing things for change's sake; change little, and they're ripping you off with a 3.75; don't release anything at all, and "3.5 is so full of crappy more-and-more specialized splatbooks - WotC haven't a clue what they're doing". There is no course of action which won't result in threads like this, or similar.</p><p></p><p>What they can - and should - do is do what they think will sell. And that's what they're doing, and it's all they can do.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Morrus, post: 3787333, member: 1"] That one's too easy. Branding. Look & style. Differentiating 4th from 3rd. Making it feel fresh and new. Branding is a very strong reason to do such a thing. It may not matter to you or me as a gamer, but it's a massively important factor in the survival of a product line. What is highly amusing is that, by some peoples' definitions, there's no reason to get new artwork at all (well, there's no reason to make a new game: WotC, having published all the 3.5 books it can realisticallyprofit from, shoud do the right thing and roll over and die...) - just re-use the old art. Of course, we then cue the "WotC are ripping me off by selling me the same art twice!" waling and gnashing of teeth. To a large extent, it doesn't matter what they do. People will be criticizing them for it, whatever. Change a lot of stuff and they're changing things for change's sake; change little, and they're ripping you off with a 3.75; don't release anything at all, and "3.5 is so full of crappy more-and-more specialized splatbooks - WotC haven't a clue what they're doing". There is no course of action which won't result in threads like this, or similar. What they can - and should - do is do what they think will sell. And that's what they're doing, and it's all they can do. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Give me a competent arguement that WotC is "changing rules for the sake of change"
Top