Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Giving a choice of stats to older races
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zinovia" data-source="post: 5127109" data-attributes="member: 57373"><p><strong>The ultimate fighter: Dwarves</strong></p><p></p><p>I really like the idea of granting a choice between two stats for their second bonus to the pre-PH3 races. My concern is that the obvious choice of Str for dwarves really does make them too good as fighters. They'd have Con and Str, and Dwarven weapon training, and Second Wind as a minor action. Strength really seems to fit them better than Int (which the OP suggested as a different possibility). So should dwarves just be the ultimate fighters, or should I let there be another Con/Int race, or even go Con/Dex (which goes along with craftsmen and dwarven rogues)? I'm not sure how much of a balance problem allowing strength as an option would be. </p><p></p><p>I really do like the idea of making the other races fit the PH3 model, because it encourages some flexibility in which race you play for any given class, while still preserving the racial flavor. I don't like free-form bonuses because they reduce the uniqueness of each race a bit too much. My goal is to avoid the "all con invokers are dwarves, all int invokers are devas, all con warlocks are tieflings, etc..." issue. </p><p></p><p>For humans what I do currently is to give them 2 to one stat, and 1 to a second. That makes up a bit for me stealing their specialness of a third At-Will power - I've granted that to everyone. Two at-wills feels very restrictive because it discourages people from taking anything that might be even somewhat situational over a power that's less interesting, but can be used easily under any circumstances. I thought that with their bonus to all defenses, giving humans +2 to two stats was a bit much, but adding 1 to a second stat was a decent compromise.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zinovia, post: 5127109, member: 57373"] [b]The ultimate fighter: Dwarves[/b] I really like the idea of granting a choice between two stats for their second bonus to the pre-PH3 races. My concern is that the obvious choice of Str for dwarves really does make them too good as fighters. They'd have Con and Str, and Dwarven weapon training, and Second Wind as a minor action. Strength really seems to fit them better than Int (which the OP suggested as a different possibility). So should dwarves just be the ultimate fighters, or should I let there be another Con/Int race, or even go Con/Dex (which goes along with craftsmen and dwarven rogues)? I'm not sure how much of a balance problem allowing strength as an option would be. I really do like the idea of making the other races fit the PH3 model, because it encourages some flexibility in which race you play for any given class, while still preserving the racial flavor. I don't like free-form bonuses because they reduce the uniqueness of each race a bit too much. My goal is to avoid the "all con invokers are dwarves, all int invokers are devas, all con warlocks are tieflings, etc..." issue. For humans what I do currently is to give them 2 to one stat, and 1 to a second. That makes up a bit for me stealing their specialness of a third At-Will power - I've granted that to everyone. Two at-wills feels very restrictive because it discourages people from taking anything that might be even somewhat situational over a power that's less interesting, but can be used easily under any circumstances. I thought that with their bonus to all defenses, giving humans +2 to two stats was a bit much, but adding 1 to a second stat was a decent compromise. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Giving a choice of stats to older races
Top