Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Sunseeker" data-source="post: 5925936">I agree.The 5e fighter currently suffers from the traditional fighter problem of iHit. That's a fine thing for a barbarian to do, they hit, they hit hard, they hit while yelling.&nbsp; But fighters should be a bit more than the latest apple product.&nbsp; We're talking about a trained martial swordsman.I think the Contest system was supposed to be designed primarily for the fighter for various combat maneuvers, but like other games that develop systems that supposedly take place in the blink of an eye but really take a while to resolve, I don't think it's the answer.I think the solution is still within the design of the Slayer and the Slayer's various stances.&nbsp; Integrate combat maneuvers into the iHit system and you'll produce a fighter with both variety and creativity without producing a system of interesting, but nevertheless, false choicees.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Sunseeker, post: 5925936"] I agree. The 5e fighter [I]currently[/I] suffers from the traditional fighter problem of iHit. That's a fine thing for a barbarian to do, they hit, they hit hard, they hit while yelling. But fighters should be a bit more than the latest apple product. We're talking about a trained martial swordsman. I think the Contest system was [I]supposed[/I] to be designed primarily for the fighter for various combat maneuvers, but like other games that develop systems that supposedly take place in the blink of an eye but really take a while to resolve, I don't think it's the answer. I think the solution is still within the design of the Slayer and the Slayer's various stances. Integrate combat maneuvers into the iHit system and you'll produce a fighter with both variety and creativity without producing a system of interesting, but nevertheless, false choicees. [/QUOTE]

Verification