Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Gleemax]Another thing not to like.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 3679740" data-attributes="member: 48965"><p>No, its really not. I think the idea of Gleemax is a great concept...that said it doesn't mean I have to like the way that certain things are implemented. Doesn't mean I think Gleemax the concept is a bad idea.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Okay, first let me say that I had no problem with the ToS as stated on the WotC forum. Those forums were created specifically for WotC games and they were never intended to be a central spot for all gaming. Gleemax is suppose to be something different, and arguably, the ToS are, IMHO, worse for the type of site WotC is claiming they want Gleemax to be. I'd love to be able to go here and see a game designer from another company talking about new mechanics or even a new setting for systems other than D&D or d20...of course anything he/she posts can then be used by WotC in any way they like. If I owned a gaming company such as White Wolf or Black Industries, I wouldn't want my game developers anywhere near a site like that...at least not as far as discussing new projects or game systems.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>That's great, but you seem to be of the notion that only things that pertain to WotC's IP's are up for grabs on the site, since Gleemax is suppose to encompass all gaming this just isn't the case. Your assumptions also seem to lie in the fact that only amateurs would be posting things on Gleemax, and once again, I was under the impression that the site will be embracing companies, designers, etc. outside of just d20 or D&D. </p><p></p><p>I don't know if the whole-just be happy your being published-thing is a valid argument. People get paid if they're idea or article gets published in Dragon or Dungeon...but if you want to get some feedback or criticisms on something your working on and you post it on the site...WotC can stick it in the DI without paying you or giving you credit.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is a matter of opinion, and if that's how you feel more power to you. But if that's the case it makes more sense to submit to Dragon or Dungeon, doesn't it? Or like I said above what if you just want advice on how to tweak something your working on or to have a brainstorming session with others before you submit it to one of the mags? A bigger issue you seem to be ignoring is the people from other companies who may post something, and have it suddenly useable by WotC. I guess the best policy is don't post it...but this line of thinking seems to inherently limit what I imagined one of the coolest aspects of a central gaming hub like Gleemax could offer.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Uhm...they posted the ToS, my hope is that they will come around and change them before the actual launch. As of now I think it's a big mistake that may end up scaring off alot of people, amateur and profesional, from sharing their ideas.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Imaro, post: 3679740, member: 48965"] No, its really not. I think the idea of Gleemax is a great concept...that said it doesn't mean I have to like the way that certain things are implemented. Doesn't mean I think Gleemax the concept is a bad idea. Okay, first let me say that I had no problem with the ToS as stated on the WotC forum. Those forums were created specifically for WotC games and they were never intended to be a central spot for all gaming. Gleemax is suppose to be something different, and arguably, the ToS are, IMHO, worse for the type of site WotC is claiming they want Gleemax to be. I'd love to be able to go here and see a game designer from another company talking about new mechanics or even a new setting for systems other than D&D or d20...of course anything he/she posts can then be used by WotC in any way they like. If I owned a gaming company such as White Wolf or Black Industries, I wouldn't want my game developers anywhere near a site like that...at least not as far as discussing new projects or game systems. That's great, but you seem to be of the notion that only things that pertain to WotC's IP's are up for grabs on the site, since Gleemax is suppose to encompass all gaming this just isn't the case. Your assumptions also seem to lie in the fact that only amateurs would be posting things on Gleemax, and once again, I was under the impression that the site will be embracing companies, designers, etc. outside of just d20 or D&D. I don't know if the whole-just be happy your being published-thing is a valid argument. People get paid if they're idea or article gets published in Dragon or Dungeon...but if you want to get some feedback or criticisms on something your working on and you post it on the site...WotC can stick it in the DI without paying you or giving you credit. This is a matter of opinion, and if that's how you feel more power to you. But if that's the case it makes more sense to submit to Dragon or Dungeon, doesn't it? Or like I said above what if you just want advice on how to tweak something your working on or to have a brainstorming session with others before you submit it to one of the mags? A bigger issue you seem to be ignoring is the people from other companies who may post something, and have it suddenly useable by WotC. I guess the best policy is don't post it...but this line of thinking seems to inherently limit what I imagined one of the coolest aspects of a central gaming hub like Gleemax could offer. Uhm...they posted the ToS, my hope is that they will come around and change them before the actual launch. As of now I think it's a big mistake that may end up scaring off alot of people, amateur and profesional, from sharing their ideas. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Gleemax]Another thing not to like.
Top