Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Scott_Rouse" data-source="post: 3682757" data-attributes="member: 51773">I am not trying to be the IP cop but your post does allow you to be used an example of what&nbsp; a complex issue this is . The TOS is trying to both to accomplish community creativity while preventing certain headaches. Yes it is a CYA that's why companies have TOS on their websites. But the Gleemax TOS is also trying to create a space where fan generated content can live and flourish (and maybe even see further use in products). So how do we know when you post something on Gleemax that it's for friends only vs something that you wish to be paid for? This is just one of the complexities the TOS has to try to wade through.I don't know what the plans are for Gleemax specifically&nbsp; but we have demonstrated time after time that we pay for work we use. Of course you are allowed to gripe about it here and I would suggest you also take the gripe to the source and post it on the Gleemax boards.Yeah they could if they wanted too. For example look at what Disney has done with daycares that had pictures of Disney characters up on their buildings. But again I am not here to be an IP cop. We would spend way to much time and money on this stuff and never even make a dent. It was just an easy way to make a point.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Scott_Rouse, post: 3682757, member: 51773"] I am not trying to be the IP cop but your post does allow you to be used an example of what a complex issue this is . The TOS is trying to both to accomplish community creativity while preventing certain headaches. Yes it is a CYA that's why companies have TOS on their websites. But the Gleemax TOS is also trying to create a space where fan generated content can live and flourish (and maybe even see further use in products). So how do we know when you post something on Gleemax that it's for friends only vs something that you wish to be paid for? This is just one of the complexities the TOS has to try to wade through. I don't know what the plans are for Gleemax specifically but we have demonstrated time after time that we pay for work we use. Of course you are allowed to gripe about it here and I would suggest you also take the gripe to the source and post it on the Gleemax boards. Yeah they could if they wanted too. For example look at what Disney has done with daycares that had pictures of Disney characters up on their buildings. But again I am not here to be an IP cop. We would spend way to much time and money on this stuff and never even make a dent. It was just an easy way to make a point. [/QUOTE]

Verification