Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ShadowDenizen" data-source="post: 3836714" data-attributes="member: 16485">I'm neautral about the 4E print books still. May pick up, May not.But as to the DI?&nbsp; At this point, I've been looking at it in passing, and once it goes fee-based? I think it's getting a big &quot;PASS&quot; from me.I think that WotC -really- needed to impress right out of the gate with this, and the most praise I've heard is that the site/content is &quot;Serviceable&quot;'; not exactly high praise.Personally, I find:A) The title &quot;Gleemax&quot;, IMO, -still- bugs. (Sure, it sounds dumb, but a good name can draw people, or a bad name can certainly deter people from visiting!!) B) The site itself is clunky, unorganized and SLOOOOW. (At least for me, and I have a decent, if not spectacular, Internet connection.)&nbsp; Granted, this may change as time passes, but I'm not at all impressed at this stage.C) Content?&nbsp; Well, I certainly prefer Print, but I would consider Digital Format. I am, however, less likely to pay a monthly fee for it than I am for a print magazine.&nbsp; The &quot;Lost Caverns&quot;? Was actually quite good (Kudos to Mouseferatu for continually putting out quality stuff!!), but not enough to sway my opinion overall.&nbsp; (Sorry!!)&nbsp; 8PD) Taking into account the debacle that was &quot;E-Tools&quot; doesn't instill me with hope for the new system either.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ShadowDenizen, post: 3836714, member: 16485"] I'm neautral about the 4E print books still. May pick up, May not. But as to the DI? At this point, I've been looking at it in passing, and once it goes fee-based? I think it's getting a big "PASS" from me. I think that WotC -really- needed to impress right out of the gate with this, and the most praise I've heard is that the site/content is "Serviceable"'; not exactly high praise. Personally, I find: A) The title "Gleemax", IMO, -still- bugs. (Sure, it sounds dumb, but a good name can draw people, or a bad name can certainly deter people from visiting!!) B) The site itself is clunky, unorganized and SLOOOOW. (At least for me, and I have a decent, if not spectacular, Internet connection.) Granted, this may change as time passes, but I'm not at all impressed at this stage. C) Content? Well, I certainly prefer Print, but I would consider Digital Format. I am, however, less likely to pay a monthly fee for it than I am for a print magazine. The "Lost Caverns"? Was actually quite good (Kudos to Mouseferatu for continually putting out quality stuff!!), but not enough to sway my opinion overall. (Sorry!!) 8P D) Taking into account the debacle that was "E-Tools" doesn't instill me with hope for the new system either. [/QUOTE]

Verification