Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Gleemax Q&A
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Brown Jenkin" data-source="post: 4117647" data-attributes="member: 2572"><p>This is actually my problem with board moderation. Not the application of of moderation in particular cases but the overall structure that is set up. In order for the boards to be seen as anything other than WotC boards the moderation structure has to be different from the WotC board structure. While the VCLs for the Gleemax side may be different from the VCLs on the WotC side, they all report to the same CM department. In order for me to see Gleemax as a seperate entity I need to see that the moderation is seperate as well and reports to hierarchy that is seperate and independent of the CM/CS departments at WotC. </p><p></p><p>While I have no case to speak of right now I can easily see future problems where editorial or CoC descisions are made against people who speak out or have issues with WotC. Whether or not any moderation decsions are justified or not the blame will immediately be leveled at WotC for censorship of those they dissagree with. In order for the site to truely be seen as a place for all gamers, those gamers will need to be free to praise or critize any gaming company, and in order for that to happen they need to be confident that the moderation is not being done by people who have a vested interest in one particular company. </p><p></p><p>I realize that WotC is bankrolling this, and they have already made some steps in this direction by having an independent advisory board. What they need to do is continue down this road and have an independent moderation force. Just look here at ENWorld to see that responsible individuals who care about the community are able to do thier jobs without needing to report to a corporate hierarchy. My hope is that these moderators will be loyal to and support the Gleemax philosophy instead of being there because they support Gleemax because it is a WotC venture.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Brown Jenkin, post: 4117647, member: 2572"] This is actually my problem with board moderation. Not the application of of moderation in particular cases but the overall structure that is set up. In order for the boards to be seen as anything other than WotC boards the moderation structure has to be different from the WotC board structure. While the VCLs for the Gleemax side may be different from the VCLs on the WotC side, they all report to the same CM department. In order for me to see Gleemax as a seperate entity I need to see that the moderation is seperate as well and reports to hierarchy that is seperate and independent of the CM/CS departments at WotC. While I have no case to speak of right now I can easily see future problems where editorial or CoC descisions are made against people who speak out or have issues with WotC. Whether or not any moderation decsions are justified or not the blame will immediately be leveled at WotC for censorship of those they dissagree with. In order for the site to truely be seen as a place for all gamers, those gamers will need to be free to praise or critize any gaming company, and in order for that to happen they need to be confident that the moderation is not being done by people who have a vested interest in one particular company. I realize that WotC is bankrolling this, and they have already made some steps in this direction by having an independent advisory board. What they need to do is continue down this road and have an independent moderation force. Just look here at ENWorld to see that responsible individuals who care about the community are able to do thier jobs without needing to report to a corporate hierarchy. My hope is that these moderators will be loyal to and support the Gleemax philosophy instead of being there because they support Gleemax because it is a WotC venture. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Gleemax Q&A
Top