Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Gleemax
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wayne62682" data-source="post: 4872785" data-attributes="member: 40455"><p>The whole problem with Gleemax is that WotC didn't understand what it takes to create a decent web application. I'm a web developer and their main issue was that they had forums created with PHP (a modified vBulletin, I believe) and decided to do the Gleemax site in ASP.NET, with the ASP.NET site acting as a gateway between the two for single sign-on. As any .NET developer knows, ASP.NET doesn't really like to work with PHP, and vice versa; what they should have done was chosen a single platform and created a new application from scratch that had both features, but they wanted to rush to market and keep the current forums going, which is an understandable idea, but one that just doesn't work in software, ever. It's never a good idea to have two "critical" applications written in two different languages and expect them to work together. - the sheer amount of work involved makes it almost always better to pick one platform and rewrite the legacy stuff to use it. </p><p></p><p>Also, the fact that most of the technical aspects seemed to be created using the standard Microsoft "drag and drop" approach (I have no proof of this but the way the app worked seemed very much like the standard ASP.NET controls with code behind stuff, not a proper n-tier architecture; just smile and nod if that makes no sense to you; I'm a programmer <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> ) meant that the code was neither scalable nor extendable, so they would have run into a boatload of problems down the road for not properly architecting the web application. Coupled with the fact that the forums were, and still are, buggy as hell (I remember when they were down regularly dozens of times per day and WotC's only response was "MySQL can't handle the number of posts we have" - proving they have no competent technical staff whatsoever since MySQL can scale) made Gleemax doomed from the start.</p><p></p><p>The concept was great, and if I ever get around to it I might revisit my own D&D Social Site idea that I tossed around right when Gleemax was announced (I called it "18 Charisma").</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wayne62682, post: 4872785, member: 40455"] The whole problem with Gleemax is that WotC didn't understand what it takes to create a decent web application. I'm a web developer and their main issue was that they had forums created with PHP (a modified vBulletin, I believe) and decided to do the Gleemax site in ASP.NET, with the ASP.NET site acting as a gateway between the two for single sign-on. As any .NET developer knows, ASP.NET doesn't really like to work with PHP, and vice versa; what they should have done was chosen a single platform and created a new application from scratch that had both features, but they wanted to rush to market and keep the current forums going, which is an understandable idea, but one that just doesn't work in software, ever. It's never a good idea to have two "critical" applications written in two different languages and expect them to work together. - the sheer amount of work involved makes it almost always better to pick one platform and rewrite the legacy stuff to use it. Also, the fact that most of the technical aspects seemed to be created using the standard Microsoft "drag and drop" approach (I have no proof of this but the way the app worked seemed very much like the standard ASP.NET controls with code behind stuff, not a proper n-tier architecture; just smile and nod if that makes no sense to you; I'm a programmer :) ) meant that the code was neither scalable nor extendable, so they would have run into a boatload of problems down the road for not properly architecting the web application. Coupled with the fact that the forums were, and still are, buggy as hell (I remember when they were down regularly dozens of times per day and WotC's only response was "MySQL can't handle the number of posts we have" - proving they have no competent technical staff whatsoever since MySQL can scale) made Gleemax doomed from the start. The concept was great, and if I ever get around to it I might revisit my own D&D Social Site idea that I tossed around right when Gleemax was announced (I called it "18 Charisma"). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Gleemax
Top