Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Globe of Invulnerability, lesser questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="entr0py" data-source="post: 3252387" data-attributes="member: 27244"><p>1) No where does RAW say or imply that just because the caster is bigger than medium size the areas of her spells should increase proportionately. Nor does it mandate that just because a caster has access to a spell, it must be useful to her. Perhaps a Huge size caster would cast such a "size limited" spell simply to protect her smaller allies. </p><p>The PHB says "10' radius emanation" -- that's what it means -- that's what it is.</p><p>Perhaps a caster of great size should have to invest in the "Widen Spell" metamagic feat instead of having it granted automatically. :\ </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>2) I've always read "You can leave and return to the globe without penalty." As, "it does not prevent the caster from physically crossing the barrier" (like a <em>wall of force</em> or <em>antimagic field</em> does), nor does "leaving and returning" effect the duration or effectiveness of the spell.</p><p></p><p>I do NOT read that the <em>GoI </em>spell effect possesses some sort of cosmic intelligence or memory that "knows" which spells were cast before it and that it should "leave those spells alone." </p><p></p><p>It is simple and it makes sense to me that spells cast before the <em>GoI </em>remain in effect unless the caster leaves the area and returns. At which point, all his in-place, lower-level spells are subect to the suppression effect of the <em>GoI</em>. In other words, it is the act of crossing <em>into </em>the area of the field that invokes the suppression effect (similar to <em>antimagic field</em>.) Therefore, I believe Abraxas's "2b" is the correct answer.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> put aside your <em>need </em>to be right and instead use Occam's razor.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="entr0py, post: 3252387, member: 27244"] 1) No where does RAW say or imply that just because the caster is bigger than medium size the areas of her spells should increase proportionately. Nor does it mandate that just because a caster has access to a spell, it must be useful to her. Perhaps a Huge size caster would cast such a "size limited" spell simply to protect her smaller allies. The PHB says "10' radius emanation" -- that's what it means -- that's what it is. Perhaps a caster of great size should have to invest in the "Widen Spell" metamagic feat instead of having it granted automatically. :\ 2) I've always read "You can leave and return to the globe without penalty." As, "it does not prevent the caster from physically crossing the barrier" (like a [I]wall of force[/I] or [I]antimagic field[/I] does), nor does "leaving and returning" effect the duration or effectiveness of the spell. I do NOT read that the [I]GoI [/I]spell effect possesses some sort of cosmic intelligence or memory that "knows" which spells were cast before it and that it should "leave those spells alone." It is simple and it makes sense to me that spells cast before the [I]GoI [/I]remain in effect unless the caster leaves the area and returns. At which point, all his in-place, lower-level spells are subect to the suppression effect of the [I]GoI[/I]. In other words, it is the act of crossing [I]into [/I]the area of the field that invokes the suppression effect (similar to [I]antimagic field[/I].) Therefore, I believe Abraxas's "2b" is the correct answer. ;) put aside your [I]need [/I]to be right and instead use Occam's razor. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Globe of Invulnerability, lesser questions
Top