Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Globe of Invulnerability, lesser questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Abraxas" data-source="post: 3252589" data-attributes="member: 1266"><p>You are quite right that it doesn't say that the spell has to be useful - I just find it odd that it is included in so many write ups of casters who have almost no use for it - and find it doubly odd for those who cast as sorcerers and have a limits on spells known. Thats why I made the "I have been wondering how unbalancing it would be to change these radius emanations to emanations X distance from the squares the creature occupies." comment</p><p></p><p></p><p>If that was indeed what "You can leave and return to the globe without penalty." meant why was it not also present in the 3.0 version of the spell? (The description in 3.0 definitely works as you are interpreting the spell) Or better yet, just say you can leave and return. Perhaps it is because "with out penalty" means something other then being physically prevented from crossing (something the spell has never done). </p><p></p><p></p><p>Given that it is magic, and we already have spells that can determine friend from foe or react to ongoing conditions I don't find it difficult to reason that spells have some sort of "magic time stamp" that <em>GoI</em> reacts to. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> </p><p></p><p>2b is a question looking for a yes no answer, not an answer <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></p><p></p><p> </p><p>No need here - just looking for other arguements that actually support your position other than its weird and I don't like it <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> </p><p>You don't get to eat your cake and have it to - you don't get "a 10 ft emanation is a 10 foot emanation" but "spells cast before" doesn't mean "spells cast before" <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /> </p><p></p><p>To me, it doesn't get much simpler than "Spells of 4th level and higher are not affected by the globe, nor are spells already in effect when the globe is cast."</p><p></p><p>And what are you doing on the boards anyways - anniversary over already? <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Abraxas, post: 3252589, member: 1266"] You are quite right that it doesn't say that the spell has to be useful - I just find it odd that it is included in so many write ups of casters who have almost no use for it - and find it doubly odd for those who cast as sorcerers and have a limits on spells known. Thats why I made the "I have been wondering how unbalancing it would be to change these radius emanations to emanations X distance from the squares the creature occupies." comment If that was indeed what "You can leave and return to the globe without penalty." meant why was it not also present in the 3.0 version of the spell? (The description in 3.0 definitely works as you are interpreting the spell) Or better yet, just say you can leave and return. Perhaps it is because "with out penalty" means something other then being physically prevented from crossing (something the spell has never done). Given that it is magic, and we already have spells that can determine friend from foe or react to ongoing conditions I don't find it difficult to reason that spells have some sort of "magic time stamp" that [I]GoI[/I] reacts to. :D 2b is a question looking for a yes no answer, not an answer :p No need here - just looking for other arguements that actually support your position other than its weird and I don't like it ;) You don't get to eat your cake and have it to - you don't get "a 10 ft emanation is a 10 foot emanation" but "spells cast before" doesn't mean "spells cast before" :confused: To me, it doesn't get much simpler than "Spells of 4th level and higher are not affected by the globe, nor are spells already in effect when the globe is cast." And what are you doing on the boards anyways - anniversary over already? :lol: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Globe of Invulnerability, lesser questions
Top