Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Glory of the Giants' AI-Enhanced Art
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Justice and Rule" data-source="post: 9089524" data-attributes="member: 6778210"><p>I'm quite aware of how quick it's going. Trust me, I'm following it fairly closely. But at the same time, with great strides come setbacks, too. We were mocking AI for its problems with hands (and teeth, which was another big tell), but as it has gotten better at that it still has problems, even when just "enhancing" things. I would definitely agree that using the AI first and then having the human touch is probably the better workaround, but the inherent problem there is that getting the exact product you want is kind of a crapshoot with AI.</p><p></p><p>But really, I was just trying to point to the problems with just using straight-AI using Zardnaar's pictures as examples. Their flaws aren't really a style thing like you could say Liefeld's could maybe be taken as, but artifacting that becomes obvious when you take more than glance at it. It can still work in some ways, but as we've seen with the blowback from stuff like <em>Secret Invasion</em>'s opening, it's still not there.</p><p></p><p>Whether it <em>will</em> be where it needs to be in a year, 5 years, and 10 years... well, we'll see. I do feel like we're only in the foothills of AI and the real climb of fine refinement has yet to begin. But again, that's my instinct. I could be wrong.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Oh, I think we both agree on the ethical issues. No doubt there.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm using "copy" as shorthand because saying that it's using algorithms to identify patterns it can use to complete the prompt because I think we're both on the level here and I already write long enough posts without having to get specific <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" />. And while it's moving fast, other AI areas are running into problems right now: I mentioned large language models because up until recently ChatGPT wasn't bad at doing math but with a lot of the recent algorithmic changes it is suddenly now having problems with it. There are a lot of big and little tweaks that can create whole new problems with how it inputs the data sets and patterns. So while it is advancing now, I think we're at the point where advancing is easiest and as the refining process goes on were going to see more problems. And honestly it would be really fascinating if some of the worst people out there weren't trying to capitalize on it for cash at the expense of others.</p><p></p><p>But yeah, I could <em>also </em>be totally wrong and we can bet a lunch on that. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Justice and Rule, post: 9089524, member: 6778210"] I'm quite aware of how quick it's going. Trust me, I'm following it fairly closely. But at the same time, with great strides come setbacks, too. We were mocking AI for its problems with hands (and teeth, which was another big tell), but as it has gotten better at that it still has problems, even when just "enhancing" things. I would definitely agree that using the AI first and then having the human touch is probably the better workaround, but the inherent problem there is that getting the exact product you want is kind of a crapshoot with AI. But really, I was just trying to point to the problems with just using straight-AI using Zardnaar's pictures as examples. Their flaws aren't really a style thing like you could say Liefeld's could maybe be taken as, but artifacting that becomes obvious when you take more than glance at it. It can still work in some ways, but as we've seen with the blowback from stuff like [I]Secret Invasion[/I]'s opening, it's still not there. Whether it [I]will[/I] be where it needs to be in a year, 5 years, and 10 years... well, we'll see. I do feel like we're only in the foothills of AI and the real climb of fine refinement has yet to begin. But again, that's my instinct. I could be wrong. Oh, I think we both agree on the ethical issues. No doubt there. I'm using "copy" as shorthand because saying that it's using algorithms to identify patterns it can use to complete the prompt because I think we're both on the level here and I already write long enough posts without having to get specific :p. And while it's moving fast, other AI areas are running into problems right now: I mentioned large language models because up until recently ChatGPT wasn't bad at doing math but with a lot of the recent algorithmic changes it is suddenly now having problems with it. There are a lot of big and little tweaks that can create whole new problems with how it inputs the data sets and patterns. So while it is advancing now, I think we're at the point where advancing is easiest and as the refining process goes on were going to see more problems. And honestly it would be really fascinating if some of the worst people out there weren't trying to capitalize on it for cash at the expense of others. But yeah, I could [I]also [/I]be totally wrong and we can bet a lunch on that. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Glory of the Giants' AI-Enhanced Art
Top