Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- individual adventure modules! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed to plug in to your game.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 8154064" data-attributes="member: 93670">no you proved nothing with your <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/gm-authority-edited-for-clarity-post-148.677008/post-8153611" target="_blank">claim</a>.  "some groups" & an anecdote is not proof of anything.  You claimed that the type of behavior displayed by Cersi would be  ok in a PC because there might be "some groups" with a gm so oblivious to a problem player's toxic antics that other players in the group were forced to resort to "PvP" to keep a player like that from destroying the campaign they feel forced to continue in for whatever reason instead of finding a different gm who may or may not be in the area & social circles they have access to.  We haven't had kender protected by weasel wording & absolute morality for decades due to that exact reason.   That's an experiment that was tried during 2e & recognized as a massive failure.No I summarized <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/gm-authority-edited-for-clarity-post-148.677008/post-8153427" target="_blank">this atrocity</a>.  I may not be an "arbiter" but I can point at how the sort of toxic behavior cersi displayed towards other wound be players if she were a pc that were the sort of thing to drive groups apart & damages the experience of the other players or how kender were excised with extreme prejudice for all of those reasons  while you & max can only say that it might be ok for "some groups" & cite anecdotes.</blockquote>

Verification