Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Foundry of Decay" data-source="post: 1404624" data-attributes="member: 846">I like pretty much all the core classes, and don't disallow any of them.&nbsp; Diversity is what sets a party apart from the cliche'&nbsp; (Personally I wouldn't want to run a group of all fighters, or a group with absolutely no caster types, but that is personal preference).The only semi-core class I don't allow is the Oathsworn (or is it Oathbound?) from Monte Cook's Arcana Unearthed.&nbsp; While the class itself is valid, I tend to run a pretty open ended type of campaign and don't care for the rigid need for such a character to be tied to a very specific oath, and the harsh penalties that come with failing after a certain time (I'd be driven to distraction just timing a campaign to that one Oathsword character.. Imagine suddenly having to veer off of a quest because the character had to finish his Oath or be turned into a veritable turnip).Otherwise its pretty much all good.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Foundry of Decay, post: 1404624, member: 846"] I like pretty much all the core classes, and don't disallow any of them. Diversity is what sets a party apart from the cliche' (Personally I wouldn't want to run a group of all fighters, or a group with absolutely no caster types, but that is personal preference). The only semi-core class I don't allow is the Oathsworn (or is it Oathbound?) from Monte Cook's Arcana Unearthed. While the class itself is valid, I tend to run a pretty open ended type of campaign and don't care for the rigid need for such a character to be tied to a very specific oath, and the harsh penalties that come with failing after a certain time (I'd be driven to distraction just timing a campaign to that one Oathsword character.. Imagine suddenly having to veer off of a quest because the character had to finish his Oath or be turned into a veritable turnip). Otherwise its pretty much all good. [/QUOTE]

Verification