Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
GM dislikes certain classes...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tzarevitch" data-source="post: 1406427" data-attributes="member: 1792"><p>Personally, I dislike the barbarian and I have never been fond of monks outside of an Oriental Adventures setting. First of all, the name "Barbarian" is derogatory (the class should properly be called "berserker") and I think the 1st edition holdover of all of them being illiterate savages is stupid. The problem is that the work has social connotations, and all of them are very negative. Go up to someone on the street and call him a "barbarian" and see what happens. Call someone that in many eastern countries and you'd better be prepared to run. </p><p></p><p>I also think the class has no reason to exist as a separate class. I think that Rage should've been a feat (rage 1/day per feat devoted to it) not a class ability. That alllows you to modify a fighter into a berserker by taking the feat and still leaves you with a better berserker than the barbarian. </p><p></p><p>As for monks, I think that is another with a name problem that is a holdover from 1e. I like the class but the name irritates me. They they are martial artists specialists, not merely "monks". Yes some monks are kung fu, shaolin-style martial artists but most of them aren't, not even in the eastern religious traditions. The name also sees use in general english as a cloistered religious personality and this leads to a lot of confusion. ("Is he a member of the Monk class or is he an actual monk?") I refer to them as Physical Adepts a la Shadowrun because that is closer to what they are. The basically channel magic through their bodies to give themselves special abilities. I find renaming them and viewing them this way tends to make them easier to explain in most settings. </p><p></p><p>That being said, I never disallow players from playing those classes. I relize full well that the issues I have with these classes are mine alone so I never block players from using them or plot against those who do unless the setting dictates it. That does not hold true for prestige classes however. Some of them I loathe and will not permit in my games, but that is another story. </p><p></p><p>Tzarevitch</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tzarevitch, post: 1406427, member: 1792"] Personally, I dislike the barbarian and I have never been fond of monks outside of an Oriental Adventures setting. First of all, the name "Barbarian" is derogatory (the class should properly be called "berserker") and I think the 1st edition holdover of all of them being illiterate savages is stupid. The problem is that the work has social connotations, and all of them are very negative. Go up to someone on the street and call him a "barbarian" and see what happens. Call someone that in many eastern countries and you'd better be prepared to run. I also think the class has no reason to exist as a separate class. I think that Rage should've been a feat (rage 1/day per feat devoted to it) not a class ability. That alllows you to modify a fighter into a berserker by taking the feat and still leaves you with a better berserker than the barbarian. As for monks, I think that is another with a name problem that is a holdover from 1e. I like the class but the name irritates me. They they are martial artists specialists, not merely "monks". Yes some monks are kung fu, shaolin-style martial artists but most of them aren't, not even in the eastern religious traditions. The name also sees use in general english as a cloistered religious personality and this leads to a lot of confusion. ("Is he a member of the Monk class or is he an actual monk?") I refer to them as Physical Adepts a la Shadowrun because that is closer to what they are. The basically channel magic through their bodies to give themselves special abilities. I find renaming them and viewing them this way tends to make them easier to explain in most settings. That being said, I never disallow players from playing those classes. I relize full well that the issues I have with these classes are mine alone so I never block players from using them or plot against those who do unless the setting dictates it. That does not hold true for prestige classes however. Some of them I loathe and will not permit in my games, but that is another story. Tzarevitch [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
GM dislikes certain classes...
Top