Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="zakael19" data-source="post: 9623566" data-attributes="member: 7044099">I don’t think I’d find mapping a 4e skill challenge to what I’m talking about quite appropriate. I don’t have the familiarity with the mechanics of the rest of the games to say.  It’s more structuring the conversation around openness, vulnerability, etc. To quote Baker, drawing a line between AW's conflict-centric design and UHH:"In Under Hollow Hills, your character isn’t a bundle of vision, self-interest, and survival instincts, armored up and armed to the teeth. Instead, your character is a bundle of what do I want? and what do I have to give?"I've just been percolating on how to wrap that back into the games that I play that are primarily about conflict creation/clarification/escalation (occasional resolution), and how I can reduce feeling like I'm either sustaining relationships via fiat or always falling back on conflict moves (poor [USER=71235]@niklinna[/USER] 's Ranger and his boyfriend). AW actually makes it pretty easy, you see some of their thoughts bleeding into the playbooks and design for AW: Burned Over and its Sword and Sorcery spin.</blockquote>