Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
GM fiat - an illustration
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 9624155" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>The procedures are the standard ones for Burning Wheel, or Prince Valiant, or a 4e D&D skill challenge. There are parallels in AW and DW, though they're not identical.</p><p></p><p>The GM frames a scene, in accordance with principles that establish how this is to be done - those principles relate to player-established priorities for their PCs.</p><p></p><p>The players declare actions for their PCs, that engage with the framed scene. If the player succeeds, the rules indicate what happens next - generally the PC succeeds at their action. (In AW and DW it's sometimes a bit more complicated than that.)</p><p></p><p>If the player fails, the GM narrates a consequence that negates what the PC was attempting to achieve. In AW/DW, this is the time the GM makes "as hard and direct a move" as they like.</p><p></p><p>At all times - framing scenes, establishing consequences - the GM is obliged to "make a move that follows", That is, the fiction is a constraint. So are the player-established priorities. Further constraints are likely generated by the local, particular details of the action declaration.</p><p></p><p>In this sort of RPGing, there is not "collective authorship", any more than a D&D combat is collective authorship. The procedures make sure of that. Sometimes the only thing that follows is something that <em>no one at the table would author</em> were they free to author as they like.</p><p></p><p>The system of constraints, and the narrations that they permit and oblige, are the analogue to the inference rules of mathematics or of law. Obviously they are different sorts of inference rules, operating on different material and in a different domain. The participants need to be on the same page even moreso than in law (which requires more same-pagedness than mathematics) - but then, that is generally true for any successful RPGing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 9624155, member: 42582"] The procedures are the standard ones for Burning Wheel, or Prince Valiant, or a 4e D&D skill challenge. There are parallels in AW and DW, though they're not identical. The GM frames a scene, in accordance with principles that establish how this is to be done - those principles relate to player-established priorities for their PCs. The players declare actions for their PCs, that engage with the framed scene. If the player succeeds, the rules indicate what happens next - generally the PC succeeds at their action. (In AW and DW it's sometimes a bit more complicated than that.) If the player fails, the GM narrates a consequence that negates what the PC was attempting to achieve. In AW/DW, this is the time the GM makes "as hard and direct a move" as they like. At all times - framing scenes, establishing consequences - the GM is obliged to "make a move that follows", That is, the fiction is a constraint. So are the player-established priorities. Further constraints are likely generated by the local, particular details of the action declaration. In this sort of RPGing, there is not "collective authorship", any more than a D&D combat is collective authorship. The procedures make sure of that. Sometimes the only thing that follows is something that [I]no one at the table would author[/I] were they free to author as they like. The system of constraints, and the narrations that they permit and oblige, are the analogue to the inference rules of mathematics or of law. Obviously they are different sorts of inference rules, operating on different material and in a different domain. The participants need to be on the same page even moreso than in law (which requires more same-pagedness than mathematics) - but then, that is generally true for any successful RPGing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
GM fiat - an illustration
Top